The Ordeal of Richard Feverel: A History of a Father and SonMeredith, George
General
The Ordeal of Richard Feverel: A History of a Father and Son
Meredith, George
Domestic fiction; England -- Fiction; Fathers and sons -- Fiction
The difficulty with a style so artificial and intellectualized is
obvious. Meredith, according to Brownell, "flatters one's cleverness
at first, but in the end he fatigues it." The perpetual crackle of
aphorism and metaphor surprises, gratifies, and then wearies; for a
writer who will never say a plain thing plainly, not only keeps his
readers under strain, but soon seems himself to be straining.
Nowhere is this more evident than in Meredith's predilection for
repeating a single happy phrase such as the epithet "rogue in
porcelain" applied to a heroine. Since the phrase tickles his fancy,
he plays with it, drops it, picks it up, mumbles it over and over as
a dog might a bone, and through chapter after chapter is ready at
any pretext to run round and round with it barking. Despite his
assiduous striving for novelty, therefore, Meredith is often
tedious, an effect induced, not merely by his style (whether
repetitious or gasping after eccentricity), but also by his method.
He is so intent upon weaving his commentary upon every speech and
action that the occasion of the commentary is smothered. A phrase
becomes the text of a sermon, a gesture the excuse for paragraphs of
oblique reflection. Thus he forfeits the advantage of downright
sincerity and of forthright progress, and teases interest out of all
patience.
V
Since Meredith is an intellectualist, we naturally ask what may be
his philosophy. Unlike Ibsen or Browning, he preaches no doctrine.
He offers no explicit theory of life. Nor does he, like Dickens or
Reade or Brieux, advocate any special reform. He is never a
propagandist. Some have lamented this fact; more have seen in it an
argument for his universality and permanence. Though he fight no
battles for specific causes, his influence is arrayed in general
against certain tendencies that he disapproves and would laugh to
defeat. Egoism, sentimentalism, hypocrisy, are fair game for his
comedy. As an intellectualist he dislikes and distrusts excess of
emotion--feeling indulged for its own sake. "Sentimentalists," he
declares, "are they who seek to enjoy without incurring the immense
debtorship for a thing done."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account