Northwest boundary of the United States; Oregon question
"If the present state of occupancy is urged on the part of Great
Britain, the probability of the manner in which the territory west
of the Rocky Mountains must be settled belongs also essentially to
the subject. Under whatever nominal sovereignty that country may be
placed, and whatever its ultimate destinies may be, it is nearly
reduced to a certainty that it will be almost exclusively peopled
by the surplus population of the United States. The distance from
Great Britain, and the expense incident to emigration, forbid the
expectation of any being practicable from that quarter but on a
comparatively small scale. Allowing the rate of increase to be the
same in the United States and in the North American British
possessions, the difference in the actual population of both is
such that the progressive rate which would, within forty years, add
three millions to these, would within the same time give a positive
increase of more than twenty millions to the United States. And if
circumstances, arising from localities and habits, have given
superior facilities to British subjects of extending their commerce
with the natives, and to that expansion which has the appearance,
and the appearance only, of occupancy, the slower but sure progress
and extension of an agricultural population will be regulated by
distance, by natural obstacles, and by its own amount."
There was no exaggeration in that comparative view; the superiority of
the progressive increase of population in the United States was, on the
contrary, underrated. The essential difference is, that migration from
the United States to Oregon is the result of purely natural causes,
whilst England, in order to colonize that country, must resort to
artificial means. The number of American emigrants may not, during the
first next ensuing years, be as great as seems to be anticipated. It
will at first be limited by the amount of provisions with which the
earlier settlers can supply them during the first year, and till they
can raise a crop themselves; and the rapidity with which a new country
may be settled is also lessened where maize cannot be profitably
cultivated.
Whether more or less prompt, the result is nevertheless indubitable. The
snowball sooner or later becomes an avalanche: where the cultivator of
the soil has once made a permanent establishment game and hunters
disappear; within a few years the fur trade will have died its natural
death, and no vestige shall remain, at least south of Fuca's Straits, of
that temporary occupancy, of those vested British interests, which the
British Government is now bound to protect. When the whole territory
shall have thus fallen in the possession of an agricultural industrious
population, the question recurs, by what principle will then the right
of sovereignty, all along kept in abeyance, be determined?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account