The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical ViewpointLoeb, Jacques
Science
The Organism as a Whole, from a Physicochemical Viewpoint
Loeb, Jacques
Biology; Life (Biology); Mendel's law
by hydrolysis or some other action of the increasing temperature. This
latter is noticeable near the upper temperature limit. The reason that
1 and 3 interfere more strongly in life phenomena than in the chemical
reactions of crystalloid substances may possibly be accounted for by
the fact that the enzymes and most of the constituents of living matter
are colloidal, _i. e._, consist of particles of a considerably greater
order of magnitude than the molecules of crystalloids.[251]
[249] A full discussion of the literature on temperature coefficients
is given in A. Kanitz’s book on _Temperatur and Lebensvorgänge_,
Berlin, 1915.
[250] Van Slyke, D. D., and Cullen, G. E., _Jour. Biol. Chem._, 1914,
xix., 141.
[251] These considerations may meet the objections of Krogh to the
application of the van’t Hoff rule of temperature effect on reaction
velocity to life phenomena. See also the discussion of this subject in
Kanitz’s book.
We will now show the rôle of the temperature coefficient upon phenomena
of development. F. R. Lillie and Knowlton[252] first determined
the influence of temperature upon the development of the egg of
the frog and showed that it was of the same nature as that of a
chemical reaction. These experiments were repeated a year later by O.
Hertwig.[253]
[252] Lillie, F. R., and Knowlton, E. P., _Zoöl. Bull._, 1897, i.
[253] Hertwig, O., _Arch. mikrosk. Anat._, 1898, li., 319. See also E.
Cohen, _Vorträge für Aerste über physikalische Chemie._ 2d ed. Leipzig,
1907.
The time required for the eggs to reach definite stages was measured
for different temperatures and it was found that the temperature
coefficient Q₁₀ between 2.5° and 6° was equal to 10 or more; between
6° and 15° it was between 2.6 and 4.5; between 10° and 20° it was
2.9 to 3.3, and between 20° and 24° it was between 1.4 and 2.0. To
anybody who has worked on this problem it is obvious that no exact
figures can be obtained in this way, since the point when a certain
stage of development is reached is not so sharply defined as to
exclude a certain latitude of arbitrariness. The writer found that
very exact figures can be obtained on the influence of temperature
upon development of the sea-urchin egg by measuring the time from
insemination to the first cell division. Such experiments were carried
out in a cold-water form _Strongylocentrotus purpuratus_ and a form
living in warmer water, _Arbacia_.[254] The figures on _Arbacia_ have
been verified by different observers in different years.
[254] Loeb, J., _Arch. f. d. ges. Physiol._, 1908, cxxiv., 411; Loeb
J., and Wasteneys, H., _Biochem. Ztschr._, 1911, xxxvi., 345; Loeb J.,
and Chamberlain, M. M., _Jour. Exper. Zoöl._, 1915, xix., 559.
TABLE X
INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE UPON THE TIME (IN MINUTES) REQUIRED FROM
INSEMINATION TO THE FIRST CELL DIVISION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account