The origin and development of the atomic theoryShipley, Maynard
History
The origin and development of the atomic theory
Shipley, Maynard
Atomic theory
LITTLE BLUE BOOK NO. =608=
Edited by E. Haldeman-Julius
The Origin and
Development of
the Atomic Theory
Maynard Shipley
HALDEMAN-JULIUS COMPANY
GIRARD, KANSAS
Copyright, 1924
Haldeman-Julius Company
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF
THE ATOMIC THEORY
CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER I—THE PYTHAGOREAN ATOMISTS 5
CHAPTER II—THE MATERIALISTIC ATOMISTS:
LEUCIPPUS AND DEMOCRITUS 22
CHAPTER III—THE ELEATIC VIEW 37
CHAPTER IV—EPICURUS AND LUCRETIUS 51
CHAPTER V—POST-CLASSICAL ATOMISM 59
THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ATOMIC THEORY
CHAPTER I
THE PYTHAGOREAN ATOMISTS
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ATOMIC THEORY
It is safe to say that there is no more romantic story in the history
of science than that of the origin and development of the atomic
theory of matter. Dr. Robert A. Millikan has said that the physical
principles laid down by Leucippus in the fifth century before our era
might, with a few modifications and omissions, “almost pass muster
today” (“The Electron,” Page 7). The importance to modern students of
sound knowledge of the teachings of the ancient Atomists was emphasized
by Sir William Osler (1829-1919), who even went so far as to say that
“the student of physics may know Crookes’ tubes and their relation to
Roentgen, but he cannot have a true conception of the atomic theory
without a knowledge of Democritus; and the exponent of Madame Curie and
of Sir J. J. Thomson will find his happiest illustrations from the
writings of Lucretius”[1]--the Roman exponent of Epicurus (342-270 B.
C.), who revived the atomic theory of Leucippus and Democritus, despite
the adverse criticisms hurled at this doctrine by the great Aristotle.
Le Sage observed that “if Epicurus had had but a part of the
geometrical knowledge of his contemporary Euclid, and conceptions of
cosmogony the same as many then living, he might have discovered the
laws of universal gravity, and not only the laws, but, what was the
despair of Newton, its mechanical cause” (“_Lucrèce Newtonien_,”
Berlin Academy, 1782).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account