The origin and development of the atomic theory — John Shaqi
The origin and development of the atomic theoryShipley, Maynard
History
The origin and development of the atomic theory
Shipley, Maynard
Atomic theory
Thus the “atom” of the chemist is a highly elastic body--highly
resilient. Moreover, thanks to the genius of Professor Frederick Soddy,
of Oxford, and of Sir F. W. Aston, we now know that what we considered
but three years ago to be a homogeneous element--e.g., lead, chlorine,
carbon, iron, etc.--is in many cases--if not in all cases excepting
hydrogen and helium--a compound body containing particles of different
weights (atomic mass). On the other hand, as previously stated, we are
reverting to the Democritean theory that all atoms are composed of but
one primitive element, the hydrogen atom. And the hydrogen atom in
turn is composed of--_energy_; and energy itself is apparently of
atomic structure. All energy is, in the last analysis, electrical in
nature, the stuff that lightning, the stars, fire, rocks and metals,
the bodies of plants and animals--perhaps the mind of man--are all made
of.
With these facts in mind, let us return to Democritus, whose
errors--the errors of his age--we may now regard with due allowances.
“SOUL ATOMS”
With Democritus, as with Pythagoras and Heraclitus, fire had a special
importance, though it was not, as asserted by some of the ancient
writers, regarded by him as an element. The primitive substance, the
source of all things, whether fire, earth, air or water, was the world
of homogeneous atoms, eternal, unchangeable. Fire, composed of minute,
round, smooth atoms, was, on account of its mobility, the living and
moving principle of nature, though not the direct _cause_ of
motion. But because of the fiery, mobile nature of its atoms, they
become a secondary cause of additional motion, from their impact with
and recoil from less mobile atoms. Sensation and consciousness are
possible because of the extreme mobility of the fiery atoms. They are
the “soul atoms,” but sensibility and consciousness arise only as the
result of relatively large aggregations of these excessively minute
bodies.
“EFFLUENCES”
In order to account for the mutual action or influence of bodies upon
one another, when separated by space,--the void,--the Atomists had
recourse to the Empedoclean theory of “effluences,” or emanations,
which were supposed to be emitted by all bodies (Aristotle,
_Generatio et Corruptio_, i, 8). Penetrating the organs of sense,
they excite the appropriate sensation, and, in the case of the brain,
they produce images or ideas of things. Hence sensation is the only
possible source of knowledge, the origin of all thought being the
passage through the sense organs of “effluences” from external objects
or organisms, acting mechanically, by contact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account