The origin and development of the moral ideasWestermarck, Edward
Philosophy
The origin and development of the moral ideas
Westermarck, Edward
Ethics; Ethics -- History; Prehistoric peoples
[Footnote 54: Veniaminof, quoted by Dall, _Alaska_, p. 398.]
[Footnote 55: Theophilus Hahn remarks (_The Supreme Being of the
Khoi-Khoi_, p. 40) that Kolben's reports have been doubted by European
writers without any good reason.]
[Footnote 56: Kolben, _Present State of the Cape of Good Hope_,
i. 301. _Cf._ _ibid._ i. 339.]
[Footnote 57: Quoted by Tyler, _Forty Years among the Zulus_, p. 197.]
[Footnote 58: Zöller, _Kamerun_, ii. 92. _Cf._ _Idem_, _Das Togoland_,
p. 37.]
[Footnote 59: Hinde, _The Last of the Masai_, p. 34. _Cf._ Foreman,
_Philippine Islands_, p. 185.]
[Footnote 60: Dieffenbach, _Travels in New Zealand_, ii. 106.]
[Footnote 61: Blunt, _Bedouin Tribes of the Euphrates_, ii. 224 _sqq._]
Much less conspicuous than the emotion of public resentment is the
emotion of public approval. These public emotions are largely of a
sympathetic character, and, whilst a tendency to sympathetic
resentment is always involved in the sentiment of social affection, a
tendency to sympathetic retributive kindly emotion is not. Among the
lower animals this latter emotion seems hardly to occur at all, and in
men it is often deplorably defective. Resentment towards an enemy is
itself, as a rule, a much stronger emotion than retributive kindly
emotion towards a friend. And, as for the sympathetic forms of these
emotions, it is not surprising that the altruistic sentiment is more
readily moved by the sight of pain than by the sight of pleasure,[62]
considering that its fundamental object is to be a means of protection
for the species. Moreover, sympathetic retributive kindliness has
powerful rivals in the feelings of jealousy and envy, which tend to
make the individual hostile both towards him who is the object of a
benefit and towards him who bestows it. As an ancient writer observes,
"many suffer with their friends when the friends are in distress, but
are envious of them when they prosper."[63] But though these
circumstances are a hindrance to the rise of retributive kindly
emotions of a sympathetic kind, they do not prevent public approval in
a case when the whole society profits by a benefit, nor have they any
bearing on those disinterested instinctive likings of which I have
spoken above. I think, then, we may {130} safely conclude that public
praise and moral approval occurred, to some degree, even in the
infancy of human society. It will appear from numerous facts recorded
in following chapters, that the moral consciousness of modern savages
contains not only condemnation, but praise.
[Footnote 62: _Cf._ Jodl, _Lehrbuch der Psychologie_, p. 686.]
[Footnote 63: Schmidt, _Ethik der alten Griechen_, i. 259.]
CHAPTER VI
ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL MORAL CONCEPTS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account