The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and CountriesBerdoe, Edward
History
The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and Countries
Berdoe, Edward
Medicine -- History
The Monks of Monte Cassino.—Clerical Influence at
Salerno.—Charlemagne.—Arabian Medicine gradually
supplanted the Græco-Latin Science.—Constantine the
Carthaginian.—Archimatthæus.—Trotula.—Anatomy of the
Pig.—Pharmacopœias.—The Four Masters.—Roger and Rolando.—The Emperor
Frederick.
The connecting link between the ancient and the modern medicine was
the school of Salerno. It is true that Hippocrates and Galen in
Arabian costume re-entered Europe after a long absence in the East,
when the Moors occupied a great part of Spain; but great as was this
Saracenic influence on medical science, it was not to be compared with
the powerful and permanent influence secured by the native growth of
medical science which sprung up on Italian soil.
The origin of this celebrated mediæval institution is involved in
obscurity; it has been generally understood to have sprung from the
monastery of Monte Cassino, founded by St. Benedict in the sixth
century. St. Benedict probably possessed some medical knowledge, and
it is certain that many of his order did. The Benedictines had houses
in La Cava and Salerno. The legends of the wonderful cures wrought
by St. Benedict would naturally attract crowds of sufferers to the
doors of the learned and charitable monks. There would consequently be
abundant opportunities for the study of diseases and their remedies;
and though there was probably little enough of what could strictly be
called scientific medical practice, there was doubtless as much effort
to cure or mitigate suffering as was consistent with the rule of a
learned religious order. Some writers think that the famous school of
Salerno existed as early as the seventh century, that Greek thought
and traditions lingered there long after they had ceased to exist in
other parts of Italy; and they argue that as it was, as is now clearly
shown, a purely secular institution, it was independent in origin
and constitution of any monastic connection. Others maintain that
it was founded by the Arabs; but, as Daremberg points out,[743] the
first invasions of the Saracens in Sicily and Italy, dating from the
middle of the ninth century, had for their objects simply pillage and
slaughter; and there is nothing whatever to show in the whole course of
their devastations the slightest desire to found literary or scientific
institutions. The Saracens never sojourned at Salerno, and before the
end of the eleventh century there is no trace of Arabian medicine
in the works written by the great teachers of Salerno. It is as
unnecessary as it is unjust to seek any other origin for the Salernian
school than that of the Benedictines of Monte Cassino.[744] Bede,
Cuthbert, Auperth, and Paul were brought up at that monastery, and we
know that medicine was always cultivated to a certain extent in those
ancient abodes of learning and religion. As Balmez says concerning
Monte Cassino,[745] “the sons of the most illustrious families of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account