The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and CountriesBerdoe, Edward
History
The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art: A Popular History of Medicine in All Ages and Countries
Berdoe, Edward
Medicine -- History
JEAN AFFLACIUS, a disciple of Constantine, wrote _The Golden Book on
the Treatment of Diseases_, and another work _On the Treatment of
Fevers_.[758] Daremberg says that these works of Afflacius show no more
traces of Arabian influence than the works of his contemporaries.
He advised that the air of the sick-room should be kept cool by the
evaporation of water, and he administered iron in enlargement of the
spleen.
ARCHIMATTHÆUS lived soon after Constantine; his name occurs about
the year 1100 as the author of two important books on medicine, _The
Instruction of the Physician_ and _The Practice_. The former work
is occupied with advice, sometimes exaggerated, on the dignity of
the healing art; and though it appears childish enough to our more
sophisticated age, it is not without evidence of a desire to instruct
the doctor in all that relates to the welfare of the patient and
the dangers incurred by any deviation from the strictest code of
professional rectitude. It is unfortunately, however, blended with so
much that is crafty and sly that it approaches in some directions very
closely to charlatanism. Archimatthæus very minutely instructs the
doctor how to comport himself when called to visit a patient.[759]
He should place himself under the protection of God and under the
care of the angel who accompanied Tobias. On the way to the patient’s
home he should take care to learn from the messenger sent for him the
state of the patient, so that he may be, on reaching the bedside,
well posted in all that concerns the case; then if, after he has
examined the urine and the state of the pulse, he is not able to
make an accurate diagnosis, he will at least be able, thanks to his
previous information, to impress the patient with the conviction that
he completely understands his case, and so will gain his confidence.
The author considers it very important that the sick person, before
the arrival of the physician, should send for a priest to hear his
confession, or at least promise to do so; for if the doctor were to
see reason to suggest this himself, it would give the patient cause to
suppose that his case was hopeless. “Upon entering the house of his
patient, the physician should salute all with a grave and modest air,
not exhibiting any eagerness, but seating himself to take breath; he
should praise the beauty of the situation,[760] the good arrangements
of the house, the generosity of the family; by this means he wins
the good opinion of the household, and gives the sick person time to
recover himself a little.” After the most careful directions as to
the examination of the patient, the author takes the doctor from the
house with as much artfulness as he has brought him hither. He is to
promise the patient a good recovery, but privately to the friends he
is to explain that the illness is a very serious one: “if he recovers,
your reputation is increased; if he succumbs, people will not fail
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account