The Origin of Man and of His SuperstitionsRead, Carveth
Philosophy
The Origin of Man and of His Superstitions
Read, Carveth
Animism; Human beings -- Origin; Magic; Superstition; Totemism
Many rites and observances seem to depend upon the notion of favourable
or unfavourable currents of invisible power, which may be taken
advantage of, or influenced, to obtain one’s ends, in hunting, or in
obtaining rain, or in fertilisation of animals or crops. It is good
to plant seed, or begin any undertaking, when the moon is waxing, or
the tide rising; for these events show that the set of the current
is favourable to increase or prosperity. Again, one may incite the
current or strengthen it, as in bringing on rain by throwing water
in the air, or by leaping to help the crops to grow. To instigate or
assist in such ways the ongoings of Nature is not the same thing as
to cause the event: a rain-wizard does not pretend to procure rain
in the dry season; the times of ploughing, sowing, reaping (whatever
rites may accompany them) are not decided by Magic. Much pantomimic
Magic may be best understood as attempting to set up such currents of
causation rather than as directly causative. Since instances of cause
and effect are observed to repeat themselves, a pantomimic murder, or
a hunting dance, or fertility-rites, may be considered as setting an
example which Nature is expected to follow: the muræna-spell promotes
vitality by merely describing an example of reinvigoration. The Kai of
N.E. New Guinea hold that if a man, by falling on a stump of bamboo in
the path, wounds himself to death, it is because a sorcerer, having
obtained something infected with his victim’s soul-stuff, has spread it
over a pile stuck in the ground, and pretended to wound himself upon
it and to groan with pain.[148] The belief implies that such practices
are in vogue; and they seem to rely upon the assumption that “what
happens once will happen again”; and that who shall repeat the disaster
is determined by the presence, among the conditions, of something
belonging to the victim in default of himself. It is not by sympathy
or participation that the “something infected with his soul-stuff”
acts; but by contributing to reinstate as far as possible all the
circumstances of a cause like the cause of the man’s death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account