The Origin of Man and of His SuperstitionsRead, Carveth
Philosophy
The Origin of Man and of His Superstitions
Read, Carveth
Animism; Human beings -- Origin; Magic; Superstition; Totemism
In the Lower and Middle Miocene there appeared also horned cervuline
deer, chevrotaines, and horned antelopes; dinotheres and mastodons,
probably from Africa; primitive hedgehogs, moles and shrews; and in the
Upper Miocene, hipparion, true hares, several varieties of hornless
giraffe, true deer, and ancestral sheep. True horses and cattle are
first known from Pliocene beds; but it is needless to follow the story
further: the fauna becomes more and more modern in its character, and
uncouth forms die out.
Anthropoids are first met with in the Miocene and in Europe:
pliopithecus, allied to the gibbons, in the Lower; and dryopithecus,
related to the chimpanzee, in the Middle Miocene; but they are believed
to have come from Asia. There, in Pliocene beds of the Siwaliks
(southern foot-hills of the Himalayas), occur the orang and chimpanzee,
besides macaques, langurs and baboons. Since the orang is now found
only in Borneo and Sumatra, and the chimpanzee only in Africa,
southern Asia seems to have been the centre from which the anthropoids
dispersed; and this seems to be the chief positive ground for believing
that the human stock began to be differentiated in that region. Since,
again, by the Middle Miocene a chimpanzee form had already migrated
into Europe, it may be assumed that the orang was already distinct from
it (and perhaps had spread eastward): the differentiation of these
genera must, therefore, have happened earlier; and, therefore, also the
differentiation of the human stock; so that this event cannot be put
later than some time in the Oligocene.
How big was Lycopithecus to begin with? The answer to this question
must affect our view of his relations both to prey and to enemies.
Inasmuch as the three extant anthropoids and Man are all of about the
same size, there is a presumption that their common ancestor was in
stature superior to the gibbons and to the largest monkeys—in fact,
a “giant” ape (to borrow a term from Dr. Keith). Dryopithecus “was
smaller than the chimpanzee, but much larger than the gibbon.”[26]
Awaiting further evidence of fossils, which is much to be desired,
it is probable, on the whole, that Lycopithecus weighed less on the
average than modern man, but more than the wolf.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account