The Origin of Property in Land: With an introductory chapter on the English manor by W. J. AshleyFustel de Coulanges
History
The Origin of Property in Land: With an introductory chapter on the English manor by W. J. Ashley
Fustel de Coulanges
Land tenure -- Law and legislation -- History; Manors -- Great Britain; Real property -- History
The Bavarian law indicates still more clearly the meaning of the word.
Speaking of a man who takes a slave over the borders, it expresses it
by _extra terminos hoc est extra marcam_.[68] It is impossible more
clearly to indicate that the German word _mark_ is synonymous with the
Latin word _terminus_. Another passage from the Bavarian laws proves
that _mark_ was also used for the boundary of a private estate. Under
the rubric, _De terminis ruptis_, it says that if two neighbours are
at variance about their boundary, the judges ought first to examine
whether the boundary is indicated by visible landmarks, such as marks
on trees, hillocks or rivers. Now these two neighbours who have a
common boundary are termed in the law _commarcani_.[69] Maurer, it is
true, supposes that by this word is meant “men who dwelt in the same
mark, the same common territory,” but he would not have fallen into
this error had he noticed that the same clause in the very next line
expressly tells us that we have here to do with private property,
with land that has been inherited; for each of the disputants makes a
declaration that he has inherited his lands from his ancestors.[70]
Here we have, then, precisely the opposite of mark in the sense of land
held in common. Two neighbouring landowners are at law about their
boundaries. _Commarcani_ is analogous to _confines_, which we find
elsewhere; it is used of two men who have the same _marca_, the same
_finis_, that is, a common boundary.
That the _mark_ was a district possessed in common by a number of
persons there is not a trace in German law. But are there not, at any
rate, vestiges of some kind of common ownership? Maurer maintains that
there are; and as evidence brings forward three instances, all taken
from the Burgundian law: in section 13 he finds the words _in silva
communi_; in section 31, _in communi campo_; and in section 1 of the
“additamentum,” _silvarum et pascuorum communionem_.[71] This is quite
sufficient to convince some readers. Is not the word _communis_ enough?
And yet, let us make sure of our quotations, and with each of them let
us look at the context.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account