The Origin of the Mound BuildersCoffin, Alfred Oscar
History
The Origin of the Mound Builders
Coffin, Alfred Oscar
Indians of Mexico -- Antiquities; Mexico -- Antiquities; Mound-builders
One of these mummies has been deposited in the museum of Ratisbon,
Bavaria, and another was sent to the Smithsonian Institute. (_vid._ Aq.
Reid, Smithsonian Annual Report, 1862, pp. 87, 426.) This mummy led to
the remark of Alexander Winchell: “The humid atmosphere of Patagonia
leads to the inference that the mummification of the dead was practiced
under the influence of some controlling motive, which must have been
inherited from ancestors dwelling in a more propitious clime, and from
which even the dripping meteorology of Patagonia was insufficient to
eradicate.” The Egyptians were accurate astrologers and astronomers.
They accurately calculated eclipses and the reappearances of stars whose
reappearance would require over a thousand years, and the pyramids are
set to the cardinal points. Less than a hundred years ago, the great
Calendar Stone of the Astecs was dug up, in the City of Mexico. It is of
a solid piece of porphyry, and weighs fifty tons. It was brought many
leagues, across a broken country, without beasts of burden, and
Bustamente states that ten thousand men were employed in its
transportation. The Calendar Stone was buried when Cortez sacked the
city of Tenochtitlan, and in itself constitutes a history. From it we
learn that the Astecs were astrologers, astronomers, and calculated
eclipses, and knew the solstices of the sun. They divided the year into
eighteen months of twenty days each, and like the ancient Egyptians, had
five complementary days to make out the three hundred and sixty-five,
and every fifty-two years they threw in twelve and one-half days for
leap year. Like the Persians and Egyptians, a cycle of fifty-two years,
or “an age,” was represented by a serpent, so prominent in ancient
mythology. Their astrological year was divided into months of thirteen
days each, and there were thirteen years in their indications, which
contained each three hundred and sixty-five periods of thirteen days. It
is also curious, that their number of lunar months of thirteen days,
contained in a cycle of fifty-two years, with the intercalation of
thirteen (twelve and one-half) days, should correspond exactly with the
number of years in a great Sothic period of the Egyptians, viz:—fourteen
hundred and ninety-one.
Is it reasonable to suppose that this strange affinity with Egyptian
civilization was accidental? or that a Turanian branch independently
evolved itself into a counterpart of Hamitic Berbers? Hardly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account