[5] Max Müller, _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. i. p. 190.
[6] _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. i. p. 82.
[7] Max Müller, _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. i. p. 21.
[8] Max Müller, _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. ii. p. 1.
[9] _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. ii. p. 5.
[10] Max Müller, partly from _Chips from a German Workshop_, vol. ii.
p. 6.
[11] Darwin’s _Origin of Species_, 6th Edition, p. 396.
[12] Darwin’s _Descent of Man_, 1871, vol. i. p. 54.
[13] Darwin’s _Descent of Man_, vol. i. p. 59.
[14] _Ibid._, vol. i. p. 235.
[15] Max Müller’s _Science of Thought_, pp. 166, 167.
[16] Darwin’s _Origin of Species_, p. 403.
[17] Darwin’s _Descent of Man_, vol. ii. p. 405.
[18] Darwin’s _Origin of Species_, p. 402.
[19] Quoted by Darwin in _Descent of Man_, vol. i. p. 70.
[20] Darwin’s _Descent of Man_, vol. i. p. 71.
[21] _Ibid._, vol. i. p. 86.
[22] Darwin’s _Origin of Species_, p. 396.
CHAPTER II OUR ARYAN ANCESTORS
Some of the studies undertaken and carried on in a tentative groping
fashion, with the purpose of ascertaining the nature of that complex
being man, have been placed before you. I have mentioned the more
or less fantastic suppositions set forth on the subject, and I have
dwelt rather more fully on a recent system, of which the fundamental
portion (a magnificent scientific monument, to which experimental tests
have given a solid basis) is followed by a second part which treats
especially of the descent of man. The time has now come to examine
the studies of a school of philosophy, which, guided by a new theory,
searches in the past, and passes under review all previous conceptions,
suppositions, or even misconceptions of the previous schools.
The science of language, based on the close connection between thought
and speech, only dates back to the beginning of the nineteenth century.
The first problem presented to it is that of origin--the origin of
thought and speech in man--which two united in their essential parts,
make man what he is. The means by which this science works is called
comparative philology; it is by the analysis of languages--living as
well as dead--that it seeks to discover the infancy of human thought.
It is evident that in order to penetrate thus deeply, this analysis
must follow the whole progress of speech since it first sounded; to no
other school of philosophy had this idea occurred; all others ignored
the fact that previous to the commencement of human language, no
vestige of humanity could exist; therefore, probably, another fact had
been ignored; that the only archives in which it is possible to study
the history of humanity and the development of reason are those of
language.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account