Some learned writers have felt disconcerted when after tracing words to
their source, they have found nothing but roots with general meanings,
such as to go, to move, to run, to do; however, it is by means of these
vague, pale conceptions that language has obtained the material for
an entire language. The Aryan root _ar_ signified originally to go,
to send, to advance, to proceed, going regularly, to stir. Applied to
the stirring of the soil, it took the meaning of ploughing; in Latin
_ar-are_, in Greek _ar-oun_, in Irish _ar_, in Lithuanian _ar-ti_, in
Russian _ora-ti_; this root, from its meaning of advancing regularly,
was the name of the plough; one derivative was applied to the cattle
fit for ploughing, and also to the labourer. _Ar_ was also used for
the ploughing of the sea, or rowing, and was found in the words rower
and rudder. The Latin word _ævum_, originally from _i_, to go, became
the name of time, age; and its derivative _æviternus_, _æturnus_ was
made to express eternity. It was by a poetical fiat that the Greek
_probata_, which originally meant no more than things walking forward,
became in time the name of cattle. In French, the word _meuble_ means
literally anything that is movable, but it became the name of chairs,
tables, wardrobes, etc. In this way we see the power of language,
which, out of a few simple elements, has created names sufficient to
express the infinite aspects of nature.
The ramifications of the Aryan root _Dâ_ give a good idea of the
process. Thus _Dâ_ = to give, is in the Sanscrit _dădāmi_, I give;
in Latin, _do_; in Old Slavonic, _da-mi_; in Lithuanian, _du-mi_; in
French, _donner_ and _pardonner_; in Latin, _trado_, to give over; in
Italian, _tradire_; in French, _trahir_, _trahison_; in Latin again,
_reddo_, to give back; in French, _rendre_ and _rente_. Side by side
with the root _Dâ_, there is another root also _Dâ_, exactly the same
in all outward appearance; it consists of _D_ + _Â_, but is totally
distinct from the former. While from the former we have in Sanscrit,
_dâ-tram_, a gift, we have from the latter _dâ´-tram_, a sickle. The
meaning of the second root is to cut, to carve; the difference is
shown by the accent remaining on the radical syllable in _dâ´-tram_,
_i.e._, the cutting (active); whilst it leaves the radical syllable in
_dâ-trám_, _i.e._, what is given (passive).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account