We are able to picture to ourselves the difficulties which assailed man
in his efforts to express his impressions in primitive times, since
we find ourselves at times struggling with the same difficulties, and
there are occasions when we struggle in vain, we do not conquer the
difficulty.
Sensations which are subjective and personal are of all others the
most difficult to define, since we lack words to express what is from
its nature purely personal; and yet we have frequently occasion to
mention them, how can we best express ourselves? As the required word
does not seem forthcoming we have recourse to metaphor, and almost
unconsciously we use terms borrowed from external phenomena connected
with the sense of hearing, of smelling, and of tasting, and which
for the most part are acts or conditions in the domain of the sense
of sight. Our old acquaintances the roots, whose meanings are to
cut, to pinch, to bite, to burn, to hit, to sting, to soften, having
formed the base of the adjectives sharp, sweet, keen, burning, we use
these to describe certain sensations. We do not know how better to
particularise a physical pain than by comparing it to something that
tears, cuts or stings. But if certain physical ills, certain colour
perceptions, certain impressions of sharpness, sweetness and heat
experienced when tasting various foods find metaphorical expression in
external acts, there still remains a whole category of simple ideas
for which no words can be found. There are certain sensations of taste
which cannot be expressed in words. Yesterday I ate a pear, to-day I
have eaten a peach; I am quite capable of distinguishing the special
flavour of each, but finding nothing in the world of facts with which
to compare them, I am without words to apply to them, and it would be
as impossible for me to convey an idea of the flavour to any one who
had never eaten a pear or a peach as to make any person understand if I
spoke in a language which was unknown to him.
Since all words that succeed in expressing our sensations are drawn
from external phenomena, we are in a position to know the origin and
historic past of these words. But I cannot thus easily foresee even
the near future of some of these words. The sound of the clarionet and
that of the hautbois, the whistling of the wind, the whisper of the
waves, the yellow of the straw and that of the lemon, the green of the
emerald and the blue of the sky, all characterise objects belonging
to the material world; but if these words: clarionet and hautbois,
wind and waves, straw and lemon, emerald and sky, which alone enable
us to define clearly to our minds certain sounds and certain colours
were lacking in our vocabulary, I do not know how a musician could
have composed a symphony, or an artist painted his picture, although
the creation of both works of art proceeds equally from personal
inspiration invisible to the eye.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account