Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
essence of the story. According to Herodotus[1013] Cypselus was the
child from the cypsele in which as an infant his mother had concealed
him from his would-be murderers. [Sidenote: which makes Cypselus the
child from the cypsele.] If we are to believe Plutarch, the story of the
cypsele could still in his days be traced back to the days of
Periander[1014]. It is easy to point out[1015] that we are here up
against a widespread story of which different versions have been
attached to such different names as Sargon of Akkad (_c._ 3800
B.C.[1016]), Moses, Romulus and Cyrus[1017]. But even if we accept a
common origin for all these stories, we are not very much further on. We
should still have to determine why and how Cypselus found a place in the
series. [Sidenote: What is a cypsele? Not, in spite of some ancient and
modern authorities, either an ark or a wooden chest.] But it must not be
too hastily assumed that the cypsele of Cypselus has anything at all to
do with the ark that Pharaoh’s daughter found on the banks of the
Nile[1018] or the “alueus” discovered by the shepherd Faustulus on the
banks of the Tiber. In both these cases[1019] the vessel could float and
was discovered by a river side. Cypselus was not discovered. That is the
whole point of the story. He was not exposed in a river or sea like
Romulus or Perseus. And it is more than doubtful whether a cypsele has
any connexion whatever with an alueus or ark. It is true that they are
more or less identified by our ancient authorities. Pausanias[1020], who
wrote his guide to Greece in the second century A.D., professed to have
seen at Olympia the very cypsele in which Cypselus had been hidden and
from which he was said to have got his name. It was a coffer (λάρναξ) of
wood and ivory elaborately carved. The description leaves no doubt that
it was of archaic Corinthian workmanship of the time of the tyrants or
not much later[1021]. But it is extremely doubtful whether this carved
box was a cypsele or had any original connexion with the cypsele story.
Plato[1022], Aristotle[1023], and Plutarch[1024] all refer to the
dedications of the house of Cypselus without alluding to this object.
Herodotus says nothing about the cypsele having been dedicated. For
Strabo[1025] the chief dedication of Cypselus was a “golden hammered
Zeus.” Dio Chrysostom[1026] (about 100 A.D.) refers to what Pausanias
calls the cypsele of Cypselus, but describes it simply as the “wooden
box (ξυλινὴ κιβωτός) dedicated by Cypselus.” From Pausanias himself it
is plain that the object was not by any means what the Greeks of his
time understood by a cypsele. His statement[1027] that the ancient
Corinthians called a coffer a cypsele raises a suspicion that nobody
else ever did. It is probably only an inference drawn by the traveller
from the fact of this particular coffer being so called by the guides at
Olympia[1028].
[Sidenote: Meanings of the word “cypsele” given by the ancients.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account