Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
The tyranny at Sicyon lasted longer than in any other Greek state[1296].
It started about the same time as that of Cypselus at Corinth and
continued in the same family for about a century. The tyrants rested
their power on the support of the pre-Dorian population of their city,
and the establishment of the tyranny was probably to a large extent a
racial movement representing a rising of the pre-Dorian stratum of the
population against their Dorian conquerors.
How the tyrant family secured its power is another question. Until the
other day our only information on the subject was to the effect that the
founder of the dynasty was a cook or butcher (μάγειρος)[1297], who was
helped to power by the Delphic oracle[1298]. Thanks however to a papyrus
recently unearthed by the Oxford scholars Grenfell and Hunt and
published by them in 1915 we have now considerable fragments of a
detailed account of the founder of the dynasty[1299].
The fragment confirms the statement that the tyrants of Sicyon were
sprung from a butcher and settles the vexed question of the relationship
of Andreas and Orthagoras (the two earliest known members of the family)
by showing that Orthagoras was the first tyrant and Andreas was father
of Orthagoras. It also shows that Orthagoras himself was bred as a
butcher. But it is devoted mainly to the military exploits of the
youthful Orthagoras, and though it does not take us down to the day when
he made himself tyrant it plainly brings us very near it, and as it
leaves him in the position of polemarch on active service it seems to
illustrate and support the statement of Aristotle that the early tyrants
often owed their power to some high magistracy or military position that
they had previously secured in the state. But there are several reasons
why this military aspect should not be overrated. The account of how
Orthagoras actually seized the tyranny is after all wanting. The extant
fragment says that he secured the position of polemarch “partly also by
reason of the goodwill of the mass of the citizens towards him,” and
gives this as a separate reason[1300] from that of his military
successes. Moreover the author of the fragment was possibly Aristotle
himself, who is known to have written a lost _Constitution of the
Sicyonians_; and although Grenfell and Hunt regard Ephorus as more
probably the author, Ephorus lived at the same time and wrote under the
same historical influences as Aristotle and was probably misled in the
same way concerning the character of the early tyranny[1301]. The
outstanding fact in the early career of Orthagoras is still his
tradesman origin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account