Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
Again, in the Aeginetan temple of Aphrodite, where the pottery found by
Stais has been published by Pallat[1550], Geometric sherds, in clay and
technique not to be distinguished from Attic, were fairly numerous, but
coming down from the eighth century to the seventh, we are told that the
Attic pottery of the period, the so-called Proto-Attic, is represented
only by a few types, some of which are perhaps only imitations of the
genuine Attic.
Similarly, the excavators of the Argive Heraeum report that “in the
Argolid we find the Geometric style ceasing almost abruptly, while the
Argive style becomes as it were emancipated[1551].” Argive is the
Americans’ name for Proto-Corinthian[1552].
The vast majority of the fragments of this period from the Aphrodite
temple are Proto-Corinthian or early Corinthian[1553]. Attic pottery
reappears among the finds of about the middle of the sixth century, with
a few sherds of Kleinmeister kylikes. Pallat indeed[1554] speaks further
on of the Proto-Attic (_i.e._ early seventh century Attic) that is
richly represented at Aegina, and Loeschcke too speaks of all stages of
Attic ware from Dipylon onwards occurring in the island[1555].
Unfortunately, such terms as rare and abundant are still used by
archaeologists in the loosest and most misleading way. The only vases
Loeschcke quotes are a “Tyrrhenian” amphora, and an Ergotimos cup,
_i.e._ two early sixth century vases, both from the Fontana collection,
and attributed to Aegina only on the authority of dealers or collectors
of the early part of the nineteenth century[1556]. The fact remains that
in the properly recorded excavations on the island, it is early in the
seventh century that Attic pottery occupies its least prominent
position, and that in the museum at Aegina[1557], which includes the
Aphaia finds and specimen pieces from the 1904 excavations at the
Aphrodite temple, there is plenty of Mycenaean, Geometric,
Proto-Corinthian, and Corinthian pottery, some early Black Figure (about
550 B.C.), and a fair number of late Black Figure vases, but no
Proto-Attic at all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account