Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
The writers just quoted, following Helbig, imagine the ancient
naukraries pursuing their naval activities as members of the Kalaurian
league, and the latter, which lasted on as a religious body through
classical times, as gradually taking a back place with the development
of the other naval states they mention. Their picture however leaves out
of account the chief fact known about the history of the league. Its
original members were Hermione, Epidaurus, Aegina, Athens, Prasiae,
Nauplia, and the Minyan Orchomenos. Then at the end of the list Strabo
adds, “Nauplia used to be represented by Argos, and Prasiae by
Sparta[1632].” Strabo is here referring to a later period. It looks as
though Argos and Sparta were intruders into the league, who sought
membership to secure influence or a recognized position in the Saronic
Gulf, just as in later times Philip of Macedon, for political reasons,
set such store on recognition by the Delphic Amphictyony[1633]. Is it
unreasonable to suppose that the two intruders secured their places in
the league each at the time of his aspirations to Peloponnesian
hegemony, Sparta in the sixth century, and Argos under Pheidon? All the
known circumstances bear out this supposition, at least for Argos which
alone at present concerns us. It fits alike the naval power of Athens in
the dark ages, the eclipse of that power in the seventh century, and the
expansion of Argos just at this period. Nauplia is said by
Pausanias[1634] to have fallen to Argos only at the end of the seventh
century. But Asine, which lies further from Argos, is said to have been
conquered by her a hundred years earlier[1635]. Beloch argues with some
reason that the nearer city must have been conquered first. But there is
no need to follow him in his passion for lowering dates, and bring down
the time of the conquest of Asine. There is more reason for putting back
the date of the fall of Nauplia, and thus bringing it into the period of
Argive expansion under Pheidon[1636].
Make this not unlikely modification in the picture just quoted from
Mitchell and Caspari, and the early war between Athens and Aegina finds
a satisfactory historical setting. Before the war Athens, Epidaurus, and
Aegina are the leading states in the Saronic Gulf. As a result of it
Athens is crippled at sea, and her place, and even more than her place,
is taken by Argos. The evidence is admittedly scanty, but as far as it
goes it points to the first Aeginetan war as marking the downfall of the
naval power that Athens had enjoyed during the dark ages, or, as the
legend puts it, after the fall of Minos, when the Kalaurian league and
the navy of the naukraries were potent realities. The power that brings
about this downfall is that of the Argive tyrant Pheidon.
Appendix D (to p. 170). _Early Athenian Dress_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account