Archaeology; Civilization, Ancient; Despotism; Greece -- History -- To 146 B.C.; Wealth
When once established Peisistratus certainly set himself to secure
control of a large amount of labour by the public works that he
promoted. Kallirrhoe (the Fair Spring), the best source of the Athenian
water supply, was improved by him into Enneakrounos (the Nine
Fountains)[323]. The building that shelters the actual jets is depicted
on a black figure vase[324]. Like Polycrates and the seventh century
tyrants, he was a great builder; the group of Athena slaying a giant,
excavated on the Acropolis in the eighties of the last century[325],
probably belongs to the temple that he built to Athena[326]; his temple
of the Olympian Zeus was not completed till the time of Hadrian. Like
Periander of Corinth, he severely repressed idleness[327]. To
Aristophanes, writing just a century after the fall of the tyranny, the
Athens of Hippias appeared as a city of labourers[328].
Beloch well insists on the acute commercial instinct of Peisistratus in
getting a footing on the coast of the Hellespont by the seizure of
Sigeium[329]. Hippias not only kept his hold on the town to the last,
and eventually retired there, but actively developed his father’s line
of policy by forming a close personal connexion with the tyrants of
Lampsacus[330], and effecting a reconciliation with the Philaids, his
rivals on the European side of the strait[331].
[Sidenote: Financial troubles of the tyranny before its overthrow.]
According to the pseudo-Aristotelian _Oeconomica_, Hippias on one
occasion called in the Attic coinage at a fixed valuation, and then
reissued the same money[332]. Some scholars have tried to explain away
this last statement, and assume a change in the type[333]. But if, as is
natural to suppose, χαρακτήρ in this passage means type, then the Greek
implies that no such change was made. The other actions of Hippias
recorded in the same passage are confiscations of property (front doors,
projecting top stories of houses, etc.), sold again, with no alteration
whatever, to the original owners. Six and Babelon[334] maintain that
χαρακτήρ means denomination, and that Hippias proceeded to give the name
of didrachm to a piece that had been previously a drachm. They quote
with some effect the statement of the Aristotelian _Constitution of
Athens_[335], ἦν ὁ ἀρχαῖος χαρακτὴρ δίδραχμον. Their arguments, though
plausible, are not decisive: but whatever the explanation of these
particular words, the whole passage makes it fairly certain that the
step was an attempt to avert a financial crisis by some desperate
manipulation of the coinage. It points to a serious threat of
approaching insolvency, such as must have been the inevitable result of
the loss of the Thracian mines[336].
[Sidenote: The Alcmaeonid opposition to the house of Peisistratus.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account