The Origins and Destiny of Imperial Britain: Nineteenth Century EuropeCramb, J. A. (John Adam)
History
The Origins and Destiny of Imperial Britain: Nineteenth Century Europe
Cramb, J. A. (John Adam)
Great Britain -- Colonies -- Administration -- History -- 19th century; Imperialism; War
The Revolution of 1848 revealed to European Liberalism a more
formidable adversary than Metternich. The youth of Nicholas I had been
formed by the same tutors as that of his elder brother, the Czar
Alexander. The Princess Lieven and his mother, Maria Federovna, the
friend of Stein, and the implacable enemy of Napoleon, had found in him
a pupil at once devoted, imaginative, and unwearied. A resolute will,
dauntless courage, a love of the beautiful in nature and in art, a
high-souled enthusiasm for his country, made him seem the
fate-appointed leader of Russia's awakening energies. The Teuton in
his blood effaced the Slav, and the fixed, the unrelenting pursuit of
one sole purpose gives his career something of the tragic unity of
Napoleon's, and leaves him still the supreme type of the Russian
autocrat. One God, one law, one Church, one State, Russian in
language, Russian in creed, Russian in all the labyrinthine grades of
its civic, military, and municipal life--this was the dream to the
realization of which the thirty crowded years of his reign were
consecrated. There is grandeur as well as swiftness of decision in the
manner in which he encounters and quells the insurrection of the 26th
December. Then, true to the immemorial example of tyrants, he found
employment for sedition in war. He tore from Persia in a single
campaign two rich provinces and an indemnity of 20,000,000 roubles.
The mystic Liberalism of Alexander was abandoned. The free
constitution of Poland, the eyesore of the boyards and the old Russian
party, was overthrown, and a Russian, as distinct from a German, policy
was welcomed with surprise and tumultuous delight. "Despotism," he
declared, "is the principle of my government; my people desires no
other." Yet he endeavoured to win young Russia by flattery, as he had
conquered old Russia by reaction. He encouraged the movement in poetry
against the tasteless imitation of Western models, and in society
against the dominance of the French language. In the first years of
his reign French ceases to be a medium of literary expression, and
Russian prose and Russian verse acquire their own cadences. Yet
liberty is the life-blood of art; and liberty he could not grant. The
freedom of the Press was interdicted; liberty of speech forbidden, and
a strict censorship, exercised by the dullest of officials, stifled
literature. "How unfortunate is this Bonaparte!" a wit remarked when
Pichegru was found strangled on the floor of his dungeon, "all his
prisoners die on his hands." How unfortunate was the Czar Nicholas!
All his men of genius died by violent deaths. Lermontoff and Poushkine
fell in duels before antagonists who represented the _tchinovnik_
class. Rileyev died on the scaffold; Griboiédov was assassinated at
Teheran.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account