The origins of art; a psychological & sociological inquiryHirn, Y. (Yrjö)
Philosophy
The origins of art; a psychological & sociological inquiry
Hirn, Y. (Yrjö)
Aesthetics; Art -- Philosophy; Art, Primitive
[18] For this characteristic term I am indebted to Professor J. M.
Baldwin.
[19] Cf. chap. ix. in the sequel.
[20] Some brilliant and suggestive remarks on this point may be found
in Guyau, _Les problèmes de l’esthétique contemporaine_, p. 12; and in
Havelock Ellis, _The New Spirit_, pp. 234-236.
[21] Groos, _Die Spiele der Menschen_, pp. 508, 509.
[22] Spencer, _Principles of Sociology_, vol. iii. pp. 201-231.
[23] This view, viz. that the æsthetic cravings are a “racial”
possession of mankind, has been clearly and consistently maintained
by Marshall, cf. _Æsthetic Principles_, p. 70; _Pain, Pleasure and
Æsthetics_, pp. 100, 101.
[24] Vischer, _Ästhetik_, vol. i. p. 53; vol. iii. pp. 3-10.
[25] Taine, _Philosophie de l’art_, pp. 57-70.
[26] Engel, _Ideen zu einer Mimik_, i. p. 97.
[27] Cf. as to the significance of this process, and its connection
with the imitative process, Baldwin, _Mental Development_, p. 264.
[28] Marshall, _Æsthetic Principles_, p. 62; cf. _Pain, Pleasure, and
Æsthetics_, p. 104.
[29] Cf. chapters xiv.-xvi. in the sequel.
[30] Cf. Marshall, _Pain, Pleasure, and Æsthetics_, p. 104. (“Nor can
we with Kant and Schiller hold that the ‘art-impulse’ is especially
connected with the ‘play-impulse’ through lack of end, if I am right
that an end for art-work is discernible in _attraction through the
pleasing of others_.”)
[31] Baldwin, _Social and Ethical Interpretations_, p. 151; cf. pp.
150, 152.
[32] Schiller, _Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen_, esp.
Brief 15.
[33] _Ibid._ Brief 27, quoted in Groos, _The Play of Animals_, p. 2.
[34] Spencer, _Principles of Psychology_, vol. ii. pp. 629, 630.
[35] Spencer, “The Origin of Music,” in _Mind_, xv. 452, 453;
reprinted in the last edition of _Essays_, ii. pp. 430, 431; Wallace,
_Darwinism_, pp. 281, 284, 287, 292; Hudson, _The Naturalist in La
Plata_, pp. 280-286.
[36] Wallaschek, “Natural Selection and Music” in _International
Congress of Experimental Psychology_, second session, 1892, p. 74;
_Primitive Music_, pp. 271, 272. These utterances of Wallaschek ought
to be quoted as expressing his views, and not the earlier passage in
Mind, 1891, p. 376, from which Groos concludes that Wallaschek agrees
with Spencer. Cf. Groos, _The Play of Animals_, p. 6. As early as
1891, Wallaschek pointed out the importance of music and dances as
preparations and not only representations of the most important actions
in life. Cf. _l.c._ p. 74.
[37] Groos, _The Play of Animals_, pp. 18-24.
[38] Groos, _l.c._ p. 21.
[39] Groos, _Die Spiele der Menschen_, pp. 216-356.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account