Christianity, Conversion to -- Fiction; India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947 -- Fiction
Bopaul smiled grimly as he caught the expression on the faces of
Coomara and Ananda. The latter could not conceal his horror at the
contemplation of an existence in a lower birth, where pain and
servitude, he believed, would crush out every joy of life. His
sensitive nature revolted against the thought of the indignities and
sufferings such a birth must involve. Coomara's fatalism saved him in
some degree from the dread that overwhelmed Ananda. If he were
destined to a succession of inferior births it would be impossible to
avoid them. The inevitable must be faced. As well might a man try to
draw the sun down from its place in the heavens and stop its course as
to endeavour to upset the law of destiny.
"It certainly sounds appalling," commented Wenaston.
"Such a fate is as much dreaded by the orthodox Hindu as the fate
believed by Christians to be the portion of malefactors after death,"
said Bopaul, without hesitation.
"Then you must take care never to offend your Deity," remarked Wenaston.
"Our code of offence is different from yours. We have no decalogue. I
may commit murder, for instance, without offence, if I kill a pariah or
an out-caste; but if the victim of my enmity happened to be a Brahman,
the aspect of the deed would be utterly changed. The sin would be
enormous. Nothing short of a cycle of inferior births could reinstate
me and restore me to the position I occupy at the present time."
"None of you are likely to kill a Brahman, I imagine," said Wenaston
lightly, and with the design of dissipating a little of the solemnity
that seemed to have settled upon Coomara and Ananda.
His well-meant efforts were unavailing. It was evident that so serious
a subject was not to be dismissed in a moment.
"There are other ways of transgressing, which, if persisted in, bring
down upon us the curse of inferior rebirth," said Bopaul.
"Carelessness and neglect in the performance of our religious duties.
Manu, the law-giver, himself defines sin in clear, unmistakeable terms.
We can transgress by neglecting to read the Vedas; by falling away from
prescribed customs; by remissness in the performance of holy rites. In
addition, offences may come through using a wrong diet and omitting
ceremonial ablutions and prayers. In short, our sins chiefly consist
of the breaking of our caste rules by omission or commission."
"Your code is simple enough if you have it all laid down by your
law-giver. All you have to do is to take care not to break your
rules," observed Wenaston, ignoring a fact that he was well aware of.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account