The pageant of Parliament, vol. 1 of 2MacDonagh, Michael
History
The pageant of Parliament, vol. 1 of 2
MacDonagh, Michael
Great Britain. Parliament
The practice of the House of Commons, in recent times, was to commit
a person guilty of any violation of its privileges to the custody
of the Serjeant-at-Arms, to be detained during its pleasure. The
imprisonment generally continued until the prisoner expressed
contrition for his offence, or the House in its mercy resolved that
he be discharged. But before he was free to go he had to pay a
substantial fee to the Serjeant-at-Arms for locking him up and seeing
that he did not escape. The House, however, has no power to keep a
person in custody during its recess. If, therefore, the confinement
should last until the prorogation of Parliament, he may not only
claim his release but decline to make good the Serjeant-at-Arms’ bill
of costs. The last occupant of the prison was Charles Bradlaugh, the
Member for Northampton. His confinement for twenty-four hours, in
1880, was an episode in his long contest with the House of Commons
over his claim to be allowed, as an atheist, to take his seat without
having to use, in the oath of allegiance, the expression, “So help
me, God!” Bradlaugh, in a conversation about his prison experiences,
stated that while the rooms were comfortable, and the confinement by
no means irksome, the noisy passage of time as recorded by Big Ben in
booming the quarters and the hours at night allowed him but little
sleep.
2
Contumacy on the part of a Member nowadays would hardly be visited
by imprisonment. Among the expressions which are considered out of
order are treasonable or seditious words, the use of the Sovereign’s
name offensively, or, with a view to influence debate, disparaging
references to the character and proceedings of Parliament, personal
attacks on Members, allusions to matters pending judicial decision
in the courts of law, and insulting reflections on Judges or
other persons in high authority. The Speaker, or the Chairman of
Committees, has also the power, after having called attention three
times to the conduct of a Member who persists in irrelevance, or in
tedious repetition, to direct him to discontinue his speech. If a
Member’s conduct is grossly disorderly, or if he refuses to apologize
for an unparliamentary expression, the Speaker or Chairman orders
him to withdraw immediately from the House and its precincts for
the remainder of the sitting, and should he refuse to leave he may
be forcibly removed by the Serjeant-at-Arms and his messengers. If
suspension for the remainder of the sitting be deemed by the Speaker
an inadequate punishment for the breach of order, the offending
member may be named. The Speaker simply says, “I name you, James
Thomas Millwright.” The motion of suspension which follows the
naming of a Member is moved by the Leader of the House or, in his
absence, by another Minister. It is simply and briefly worded, to
this effect: “I beg to move that James Thomas Millwright, Member for
Little Peddlington, be suspended from the service of the House.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account