The Palace and Park: Its Natural History, and Its Portrait Gallery, Together with a Description of the Pompeian CourtLatham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
History
The Palace and Park: Its Natural History, and Its Portrait Gallery, Together with a Description of the Pompeian Court
Latham, R. G. (Robert Gordon)
Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England)
Further on to the right, as we face the west--in a recess--is the model
of the Temple of Aboo Simbel, cut in the side of a rock, in Nubia. The
sitting figures which, in the original, are of the size of the gigantic
figures which we shall afterwards see in the Northern Transept,
represent Rameses the Great, and the smaller ones around, his mother,
wife, and daughter. The original tomb is ten times as large as the
present model. It should be remembered that nearly all the models here
introduced are very much below the size of the architectural remains
which they represent. For example: the majority of the columns in the
Temple of Karnak are 47 feet high, and some are 62 feet. Turning from
this recess, and after looking at the beautiful lotus columns to the
left, surmounted by the cow-eared Goddess of Love of the Egyptians, and
having examined the two large pictures on the walls of the temple--one
of which represents a king slaying his enemies with the aid of the god
Ammon Ra, and the other a feat of arms of the same king--we direct our
attention to the columns before us, which are reduced models of a
portion of the celebrated Temple of Karnak at Thebes. This temple was,
perhaps, one of the largest and most interesting in Egypt; the principal
portions are said to have been erected by Rameses II. about 1170 B.C. It
seems to have been a fashion with the Theban kings to make additions to
this temple during their respective reigns; and, as each monarch was
anxious to outvie his predecessor, the size of the fabric threatened to
become unbounded. Temples and tombs were the grand extravagances of the
Egyptian kings. The sums that modern rulers devote to palaces which add
to their splendour whilst living, were given by the remote princes of
whom we speak, and who regarded life as only a fleet passage towards
eternity, for the construction of enduring homes when life should have
passed away. Inasmuch as, if the career of an Egyptian king proved
irreligious or oppressive, the priests and people could deny him
sepulture in his own tomb, it is not unlikely that many Egyptian kings
lavished large sums upon temples, in order to conciliate the priestly
favour, and to secure for their embalmed bodies the much-prized
sanctuary. It is to be observed, however, with respect to the names and
inscriptions found on Egyptian monuments, that they are by no means
always to be taken as an authentic account of the remains within. Some
of the Egyptian kings have been proved guilty of erasing from tombs the
names of their predecessors, and of substituting their own; an
unwarrantable and startling deception that has proved very awkward and
embarrassing to Egyptian antiquaries.
[Illustration: Column from Karnak.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account