After much controversy and bickering, and a great deal of muck-raking
by the newspapers and magazines of the United States and Europe, the
plan of a lock canal was finally adopted. This plan contemplated the
impoundment of the waters of the Chagres river by a dam constructed
at Gatun, a little village about three and one-half miles inland
from the shore of Limon bay. This dam when finished would be 7700 feet
in length, half a mile in width at the base, and 135 feet in height.
It was designed that this dam should hold the waters of the lake at
a height of 85 feet above sea-level, but it was constructed 50 feet
higher so that all danger might be obviated in case of excessive floods.
[Illustrations: AT WORK IN THE CULEBRA CUT.]
The plan of the canal contemplated that this dam should be surmounted
by three locks constructed in pairs, so that in case one series of
locks became impaired the other could be used, or ships might pass up
one side and down the other at the same time. Each of the locks was to
be 1000 feet long, 110 feet wide, and have a lifting capacity of 28½
feet. Therefore, when completed, this series of locks constructed of
concrete would be more than 3000 feet in length and about 250 feet in
width, without doubt the largest concrete formation ever constructed.
The engineers of the Panama Commission give four reasons for the
adoption of the lock system instead of the sea-level type. In the first
place, it would take twice as long to construct a sea-level canal as
it would a lock canal. Secondly, it would cost twice as much money,
and as the lock canal system is costing nearly four hundred millions
of dollars, the difference in cost would be a great obstacle to the
construction to the other type of canal. The third reason was that in
case a sea-level canal was constructed it would be necessary to place
locks somewhere along its course because of the fact of the variation
of tides between the Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans.
The tide rises and falls at Colon, on the Atlantic side, about 3½ feet,
at the time of extreme high tide; while on the Pacific side the tides
rise and fall 27½ feet, and this great variation would cause a current
to rush through the course of the canal so great that locks would be
required for its control.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account