The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war" — John Shaqi
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
“As to France,” continues the memorial of the 20th May, 1915, to the
Imperial Chancellor, “always in consideration of our position towards
England, it is of vital interest for us, in respect of our future on the
seas, that we should own the coast which borders on Belgium more or less
up to the Somme, which would give us an outlet on the Atlantic Ocean.
The _Hinterland_, which it is necessary to annex at the same time, must
be of such an extent that economically and strategically the ports,
where the canals terminate, can be utilized to the utmost. Any other
territorial conquest in France, beyond the necessary annexation of the
mining basins of Briey, should only be made in virtue of considerations
of military strategy. In this connection, after the experience of this
war, it is only natural that we should not expose our frontiers to fresh
enemy invasions by leaving to the adversary fortresses which threaten
us, especially Verdun and Belfort and the Western buttresses of the
Vosges, which are situated between those two fortresses. By the conquest
of the line of the Meuse and of the French coast, with the mouths of the
canals, we should acquire, besides the iron districts of Briey already
mentioned, the coal districts of the departments of the _Nord_ and of the
_Pas de Calais_. This expansion of territory, quite an obvious matter
after the experience obtained in Alsace-Lorraine, presupposes that the
populations of the annexed districts shall not be able to obtain a
political influence on the destiny of the German Empire, and that all
means of economic power which exist on these territories, including
landed property, both large and middling, will pass into German hands;
France will receive and compensate the landowners.”
In order to justify these formidable annexations the memorial of the
20th May, in harmony with the frank cynicism of the Pangerman doctrine,
adduces no argument but the convenience of Prussia and the profitableness
of the booty to be got.
“If the fortress of Longwy, with the numerous blast furnaces of the
region, were returned to the French, and if a new war broke out, with
a few long range guns the German furnaces of Luxemburg (list of which
is given) would be paralyzed in a few hours.... Thus about 20% of the
production of crude iron and of German steel would be lost....
“Let us say, bye the bye, that the high production of steel derived from
the iron-ore gives to German agriculture the only chance of obtaining
the phosphoric acid needed when the importation of phosphates is
blockaded.
“The security of the German Empire, in a future war, requires therefore
imperatively the ownership of all mines of iron-ore including the
fortresses of Longwy and of Verdun, which are necessary to defend the
region.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account