The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war" — John Shaqi
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"Chéradame, André
History
The PanGerman Plot Unmasked: Berlin's formidable peace-trap of "the drawn war"
Chéradame, André
Europe -- Politics and government -- 1871-1918; Pangermanism; World War, 1914-1918
M. Chéradame states with great reason that France, Italy, Russia,
England, and all the minor Powers are vitally interested in frustrating
the German project of establishing their dominion from the Persian Gulf
to the North Sea. He also warns us against making a separate peace with
either Austria-Hungary or Turkey, both of these Powers being merely
vassals of Germany. He is very clearly of opinion that the mere cession
of Alsace-Lorraine to France and the rehabilitation of Belgium cannot
form the foundations of a durable peace. If peace were concluded on this
basis, the Germans would have achieved their main object, and, as Herr
Harden pointed out last February, even if Germany was obliged, under
pressure, to cede Alsace-Lorraine, there would still be seventy millions
of Germans firmly determined to regain possession of those provinces at
the first suitable opportunity. In fact, the realization of the German
project, although accompanied by certain temporary disabilities from the
German point of view, would eventually enable Germany to strangle Europe.
I need not dwell upon all the proposals set forth by M. Chéradame
with a view to the frustration of this plan, but the corner-stone of
his programme is similar to that advocated with great ability in this
country by Mr. Wickham Steed and Mr. Seton Watson. It is to create a
Southern Slav State, which will afford an effectual barrier to German
advance towards the East. It is essential that the immense importance of
dealing with the territories of the Hapsburgs as a preliminary to a final
settlement of all the larger aspects of the Eastern question should be
fully realized. It constitutes the key of the whole situation.
For these reasons, I hope that M. Chéradame’s work, which develops
more fully the arguments which I have very briefly stated above, will
receive in this country the attention which it certainly merits. I
should add that the book is written in a popular style, and that M.
Chéradame’s arguments can be easily followed by those who have no special
acquaintance either with Eastern policy or with the tortuous windings of
Austrian and German diplomacy during the last quarter of a century.
CROMER.
SEPTEMBER 4, 1916.
PREFACE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account