The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the DifficultyHaslam, John (of Dublin)
History
The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty
Haslam, John (of Dublin)
Currency question -- Great Britain
We are fully aware that some eminent public men in England have long
been, and perhaps still are, averse to the issue of small notes; but
we cannot discover much force in the reasons which they advance for
justifying their apprehensions. It is not unfrequently assumed, for
instance, that the issue of such notes would necessarily lead to a
great increase of forgeries; as they would be likely to pass into the
hands of persons who could not have much experience in the detection
of counterfeit paper. This objection owes its whole force to the
defectiveness of the present system. If all the present banks of issue
were allowed to issue small notes there can be little doubt that
such permission would lead to extensive forgeries, as the numberless
descriptions of such notes that would be in circulation, would be quite
sufficient to baffle the discernment of even the most experienced
persons. But if the privilege of issue were withdrawn from all its
present possessors except the Bank of England, and if the latter were
allowed to issue small notes, which would in that case be the only
small notes that could ever become disseminated amongst the public,
there is not the slightest reason to suppose that this would have any
other effect than that of reducing the attempts at forgery to the
very smallest minimum. It has likewise been objected, that inasmuch as
such notes would come into the possession of a lower class of persons
than those who can ever now receive paper money, a class liable to be
seized by panic in times of pressure, the effect would probably be to
increase the dangers of the Bank in periods of difficulty. Whatever
influence this consideration may have in respect to an increased issue
of unrepresented notes, it is altogether void of weight as opposed
to the extension of bullion notes. For as we have already seen, an
increase of bullion notes implies a corresponding increase of treasure
in the Bank, for the payment of those notes, and the invariable effect
of an increase of bullion is to augment the confidence of the public in
the Bank’s security. And even supposing the very improbable occurrence
of a run upon the Bank to the full extent of the additional bullion
notes that might have been sent into circulation, the only injurious
result that this could have, would be the reduction of the treasure
in the custody of the Bank to the same amount as it originally held
previously to making the extended issues. But lastly, it has also been
advanced, that inasmuch as small notes could be directly employed
in the payment of wages, any increase in their issue during periods
of speculation would exercise an injurious influence in stimulating
excessive production. Like the preceding, however, this objection is
exclusively applicable to the unrepresented issues. For, as bullion
notes are only the representatives of treasure that is actually
retained in the coffers of the Bank, and which either consists of or
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account