The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the DifficultyHaslam, John (of Dublin)
History
The Paper Currency of England Dispassionately Considered: With Suggestions Towards a Practical Solution of the Difficulty
Haslam, John (of Dublin)
Currency question -- Great Britain
thus allowing the country banks a total profit of £1,760,000, or
nearly two millions out of the privilege of issue before their entire
surrender of it. And this appears to us as liberal an arrangement as
they could have any reason to expect.
We are now almost in a position to determine on what system the Bank of
England should be expected to render an equivalent for the exclusive
issue of paper money in England and Wales. Prior, however, to entering
upon this consideration, it will be necessary to refer to another
principle, which the present system infringes no less remarkably
than those already instanced. With the exception of a very limited
section of currency theorists, it is now universally admitted that
a paper currency ought to be so regulated as to contract and expand
in conformity with the requirements of commerce; that is to say, to
contract whenever trade is stationary and the supply of commodities
in the market small, and to expand whenever trade becomes active and
the supply of marketable commodities undergoes an increase. By the
currency theorists it is still maintained that a paper currency ought
to contract and expand exactly as a currency purely metallic would
do in the like circumstances. But this is palpably equivalent to
asserting, that whatever evils are inseparable from a metallic currency
ought to be, not avoided, but perpetuated in a mixed currency. One of
the chief defects of a purely metallic currency consists in the very
circumstance that it does not contract and expand with the decrease
and increase of marketable commodities requiring to be exchanged for
each other, but that, on the contrary, through the operation of an
influx or efflux of gold, it not unfrequently contracts or expands in
a far greater proportion than the state of the markets would justify,
thereby producing an excessive depreciation or appreciation in general
prices; while sometimes it even expands when the state of the markets
would require a contraction, and vice versa. And accordingly, this is
the evil against which common sense would desire to contrive peculiar
safeguards in a mixed currency. The present system however has most
carefully perpetuated the evil. For in the case of every considerable
efflux of gold, the circulation--that is the amount of circulating
medium, paper and metallic, in the hands of the public--must contract
not merely in the proportion required for correcting the unfavourable
exchange, but in a much higher proportion; and in every case in
which such a drain commences at a period when the Bank’s reserve of
unemployed notes is at or near the minimum, the circulating medium
must actually contract to an extent precisely equal to the amount of
coin exported. Thus supposing the drain to commence when the reserve
of notes is at the average of about £6,000,000, an exportation of
£10,000,000 of gold would not only reduce this reserve to its lowest
prudent minimum of about £3,000,000 but would also contract the amount
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account