The Paper Moneys of Europe: Their Moral and Economic SignificanceHirst, Francis W. (Francis Wrigley)
Philosophy
The Paper Moneys of Europe: Their Moral and Economic Significance
Hirst, Francis W. (Francis Wrigley)
Currency question; Paper money
Governments found it their interest to take the operation into
their own hands, and to interdict all coining by private persons;
indeed, their guarantee was often the only one which would have
been relied on, a reliance however which very often it ill
deserved; profligate governments having until a very modern period
seldom scrupled, for the sake of robbing their creditors, to confer
on all other debtors a licence to rob theirs, by the shallow and
impudent artifice of lowering the standard; that least covert of
all modes of knavery, which consists in calling a shilling a pound,
that a debt of a hundred pounds may be cancelled by the payment of
a hundred shillings. It would have been as simple a plan, and would
have answered just as well, to have enacted that "a hundred" should
always be interpreted to mean five, which would have effected the
same reduction in all pecuniary contracts, and would not have been
at all more shameless. Such strokes of policy have not wholly
ceased to be recommended, but they have ceased to be practised,
except occasionally through the medium of paper money, in which
case the character of the transaction, from the greater obscurity
of the subject is a little less barefaced.[3]
[3] Mill, _Political Economy_, Book III, chap. VII.
A few illustrations from the past may help us to a critical
contemplation of the present monetary conditions on the continent of
Europe, which constitute fraud and robbery on the most wholesale scale
ever practised by governments (with the style and title of
democracies!) upon the miserable victims, called citizens, and supposed
to be endowed with the blessings of self-determination.
Those who believe that war, if not a divine institution, is at least an
inevitable feature of human society may plead in extenuation of this
species of fraud that it is usually the last desperate resource of a
government which has pledged all its taxes and credit for war or
armaments.
I remember reading in the Roman historian Sallust of a financial crisis
which was ended by debts contracted in silver being paid off in
copper--_argentum ære solutum est_.
A few years before Adam Smith wrote his chapter on money, Frederick the
Great, during the Seven Years' War, resorted to the Jew, Ephraim, who
coined tin silver:
Outside noble, inside slim,
Outside Frederick, inside Ephraim.
But Frederick, wiser and more honest than our European belligerents,
made it his first care after the peace to restore an honest silver
coinage.
A lively example from English, or rather Irish, history is supplied by
Macaulay and belongs to the year 1689. It is one of the incidents in
James the Second's brief and luckless government of Ireland:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account