The Paper Moneys of Europe: Their Moral and Economic Significance — John Shaqi
The Paper Moneys of Europe: Their Moral and Economic SignificanceHirst, Francis W. (Francis Wrigley)
Philosophy
The Paper Moneys of Europe: Their Moral and Economic Significance
Hirst, Francis W. (Francis Wrigley)
Currency question; Paper money
The issue of French assignats began in 1789 because the assembly would
not vote adequate taxation, and Necker, the minister of finance, was
unable to borrow enough to cover the deficit. In the two years from
1789 to 1791, the public revenue was 470 millions, and the public
expenditures, 1719 millions, of livres. The deficit was covered by
assignats, or paper livres, bearing interest, in denominations varying
from 1000 to 5 livres. Thus the assignats may be regarded as a floating
debt currency. In November, 1791, the assignats were worth 52 per cent
of their face value. In June, 1792, after the declaration of war on
Austria, they rose to 57. After the victory of Valmy, in September,
they rose to 72 and remained there till December. In January, 1793, the
king was guillotined, and war was declared on England. By August, after
violent fluctuations, the assignat had fallen to 15 per cent of its
face value. Thereafter the laws enforcing the acceptance of assignats
were strengthened.
It became an offence to sell coin, or to differentiate between coin
and assignats in any transaction, or to refuse payment in
assignats, or to negotiate assignats at a discount. By a decree of
the 5th of September the death penalty itself was imposed. Here was
a forced currency indeed.[9]
[9] R. G. Hawtrey, _Currency and Credit_. Longmans Green & Co.,
London, 1919.
For a few months an artificial improvement was effected in the value of
the assignat by these ferocious measures; but in 1795, after the
Terror, the system and the paper money collapsed. The gold and silver
money, which had been hoarded, returned to circulation. In June, 1795,
the quotation of the assignat oscillated violently. On one day a louis
of 24 livres would buy 450 paper livres, on another, 1000.[10] Paper
notes which fluctuated so violently were useless as money. They could
not serve either as a medium of exchange or as a measure of value.
Country people expressed their contempt for the assignats by calling
them _l'argent de Paris_.
A new currency of _mandats_ was tried, into which assignats were made
convertible. It was a complete failure. The _assignats_ were wound up
in 1796, and in February, 1797, there was "a general demonetisation of
paper money."[11] The holders got practically nothing. France returned
to hard cash, as Mexico has done recently. In 1918, when Mr. Hawtrey
wrote, he was able to describe the decline and full of the assignats as
an 'almost unique' instance of "the currency of a great nation fading
away into nothing." The Russian paper rouble has performed the same
feat since 1918. So has the Polish mark. And now (December, 1921) the
German paper mark is also fading into nothingness.[12] In Austria and
in most of the new states of Europe, the inconvertible paper legal
tender currency has lost almost the whole of its value, in comparison
with the pre-war coin which it pretends to represent.
[10] Hawtrey, _op. cit._, chap. XV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account