The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
This setback changed the course of his career. An uncompromising
Federalist with Federalism apparently dead, politics no longer promised
a future, and he turned now to the serious consideration of the law, and
located at Frederick where the Democrats were overwhelmingly
predominant. In this community, rich, intellectual, cultured, and
hospitable, he instantly took his place among the leaders of the bar and
entered upon a lucrative practice. A Federalist from principle, he did
not hesitate, when called to lead the forlorn hope. As a Federalist, he
opposed the War of 1812. Up to this point his political career was
similar to that of Webster.
And it is in the divergence of the two careers at this point that the
future of Taney turned. He fought the war until the die was cast, and
then threw himself with intense fervor into the support of his country
against the foreign foe. Contemptuous of the disloyalists of his
political family, he summoned the Federalists to the unqualified support
of the American arms, and such was his prestige that a large portion of
the party in Maryland followed his lead.[331] By subordinating party to
country, he all but obliterated party lines, and when he was nominated
for Congress as a war Federalist he all but wiped out the normal
Democratic majority. Had he gone to Washington at that time as a lone
Federalist supporting the war, to face Webster, fighting the
organization of the army and the appropriations, his national reputation
would have come eighteen years before it did. For his was no
half-hearted hate of the disloyalty of his party co-workers. This is the
first decisive action upon which an interpretation of his political
character may be predicated.
Meanwhile, restricting himself more and more to his profession,
frequently associated with Luther Martin in the most important
litigation, his reputation spread throughout the State, and the
politician was merged with the lawyer. It was in connection with one of
his most sensational cases that he took a position on slavery and the
right of abolitionists to be heard that throws a high light on his
character and courage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account