The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
In appearance he was not prepossessing. Below the medium height, he was
spare as well as crippled. In his high forehead and the expression of
his eyes his intellect was indicated, and he carried himself with that
haughty air of superiority which men, forced to fight for their
existence, are apt to assume. This was described by his enemies as
“demoniacal.” He always dressed plainly as a workingman. Without
imagination or dreams, severely practical and to the point, conscious of
his limitations, and passionately devoted to both his convictions and
prejudices, there was nothing about him to appeal to the fashionable or
the intellectually elect. In no sense dazzling in his gifts, hesitating
instead of eloquent, shocking the Senate of his time by reading his
speeches, and proud of his profession, he was not pointed out to
travelers who wrote books, nor lionized in the drawing-rooms, nor
dignified by the complimentary notices of the women letter-writers or
diarists of his day. He has come down largely as his enemies have
painted him, and their very hate of him discloses his effectiveness as a
politician.
He was one of the Republic’s first uncompromising partisans--“My party,
right or wrong.”
IV
An Administration and party paper had been considered important in the
political circles of the Republic from the beginning, but it was left
to the editors of the Kitchen Cabinet to develop it to the highest
degree of efficiency. The “National Journal,” Court paper of the Adams
Administration, had awakened the Opposition to an appreciation of the
practical value of a powerful party paper. Duff Green and the
“Telegraph,” in a sense, met the requirements, but even then there were
Democrats of influence and aspirations who found something lacking. To
Van Buren, the editor, devoted to Calhoun, was unsatisfactory. It is
inconceivable that he felt the need for a more aggressive pen for the
Opposition. Nevertheless, in the summer of 1826, while planning a more
vigorous attack on the Adams Administration, he had an “animated
conversation” concerning the need of a strictly party paper with
Calhoun, at the latter’s house in Georgetown. The Carolinian urged the
adoption of the “Telegraph” as the party organ, with Van Buren pressing
the advantage of prevailing upon Thomas Ritchie of the “Richmond
Enquirer” to accept the editorship of a new party paper at the
capital.[358] Failing to persuade Calhoun, the Red Fox cleverly
approached Senator Tazewell of Virginia, an ardent friend of the
Carolinian, and persuaded him to join in an invitation to the Richmond
journalist.[359] Ritchie declined, however, on the ground of his
attachment to Virginia and his reluctance to leave old friends and
associates.[360] Thus, at the beginning of the Administration, it seemed
that Duff Green and the “Telegraph” were destined to become the pen and
organ of the Jacksonian Democracy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account