The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
Thus Webster entered upon more intimate relations with the White House,
with Jackson personally thanking him for a great public service, and
Livingston reiterating expressions of appreciation. The Jackson
Senators, Isaac Hill excepted, joined in the assiduous cultivation of
the orator, and he was invited to strike from a list of applicants for
office the names of all displeasing to himself. Such was the enthusiasm
of the President that overtures were unquestionably made to Webster, as
set forth by Benton,[586] to gain his adherence to the Administration.
It was a crisis in his life and in the politics of the Nation. He was
then closer to Jackson’s views on vital matters than to those of either
Clay or Calhoun. His antipathy to the latter’s doctrines was as
pronounced as that of Jackson; and he had no respect for Clay’s play to
the seditious with his compromise tariff. His ideas were not remote
from those of Livingston. Had he then broken with his old co-workers,
and allied himself with the dominant party, he would have been advanced
immeasurably toward the Presidency. Senator Lodge admits[587] that there
was much truth in Benton’s theory, but reasonably holds that the
coalition would have been wrecked by the inevitable clashing of the
conflicting temperaments.
VII
Meanwhile, with the debate dwindling to an anti-climax, Calhoun and his
friends were not nearly so indifferent to war as they pretended. It was
generally understood that Jackson was ready and eager to strike the
moment an overt act was committed. With Hayne urging caution, some
irresponsible hothead might at any moment hasten the crisis. Then, all
knew, Jackson would place South Carolina under martial law, arrest
Calhoun for treason, and turn him over to the courts for trial. Some of
the latter’s friends began to interest themselves in a compromise tariff
that would open a door of escape. The Whig protectionists, the
Nullifiers, and the Bank were rapidly rushing together to make common
cause against Jackson. Under Clay’s leadership at the beginning of the
session these elements united in electing Duff Green, of the
“Telegraph,” printer to the Senate, and Gales, of the “Intelligencer,”
to the House. Thus, through Clay, the Nullification organ secured a new
lease of life, and flooded the South with circularized appeals for
support. “If the people of the South deserve to be free they will not
permit this press to go down,” Green wrote--and this was known to Clay.
The Bank party looked on approvingly, with John Sargeant writing
enthusiastically to Biddle of the new political alignments. “The new
state of parties,” he wrote, “will be founded upon a combination of the
South, and the leaders of it are friends of the Bank upon principle,
and will be more so from opposition to Jackson.”[588] With this
alignment in mind, John M. Clayton cynically observed to Clay that
“these South Carolinians are acting very badly, but they are good
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account