The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
In presenting the measure, Clay made no secret of his purpose. “I
believe the American System to be in the greatest danger,” he said, “and
I believe that it can be placed on a better and a safer foundation at
this session than next.” Webster, however, was not impressed. “This may
be so, sir,” he replied. “This may be so. But, if it be so, it is
because the American people will not sanction the tariff; and if they
will not, then, sir, it cannot be sustained at all.” Calhoun heartily
approved the object of the bill. “He who loves the Union,” he said,
“must desire to see this agitating question brought to a termination.”
John Forsyth, representing the Administration, objected to the
introduction of the bill fourteen days before the expiration of the
Congress. Would it not be better to await the action of the House on the
bill before it--the Verplanck Bill? And he objected, properly, on the
ground that all revenue measures had to originate in the House. This
constitutional objection, raised by Forsyth, was met on February 25th
just as the House was about to adjourn for dinner, when the ever handy
Letcher arose and moved the substitution of the Clay bill for the one
then pending. The motion was carried and the bill passed the lower
branch of Congress.[603]
Thus the two measures, the Force Bill and the compromise tariff, were
pending in the Senate at the same time, with Clay making every effort,
but without avail, to pass his measure first.
On February 24th the Force Bill was called up for final action. With the
beginning of the calling of the roll, all the enemies of the measure,
with the single exception of John Tyler, arose and filed from the Senate
Chamber. Taken by surprise at such conduct, Tyler immediately moved an
adjournment. Wilkins called attention to the fact that Calhoun and his
followers had just that moment withdrawn, and the motion was defeated.
The roll-call proceeded--and only the name of John Tyler appears on the
list of the negatives. Such was always the courage of this
much-belittled man--a courage which we shall meet again.[604] Five days
later the tariff bill was called up, and Clayton offered his amendments
which were so offensive to Calhoun and his followers, repeating his
threat to kill the bill if Calhoun and all the Nullifiers did not vote
for every amendment. Clay and Calhoun consulted, and Clayton was
importuned to yield, but the stubborn protectionist was adamant. Thus
confronted, Clay and Calhoun accepted the amendments, and, as Clayton
presented them, voted for them, one by one, until the last and most
distasteful, on home valuation, was reached.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account