The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
Summoning the unhappy Duane, the President announced a postponement of
discussions until the attitude of the State banks could be ascertained.
Kendall was to be the agent of the Treasury on a tour of investigation,
and Duane was to prepare the necessary instructions.
When these instructions were delivered to Kendall, he was amazed. They
merely asked the opinions of the banks on the general question, and, in
view of their well-established hostility, it was clear enough what the
answer would be. Wrathfully hastening to the White House, Kendall
bluntly refused to carry instructions so framed, declaring the sole
purpose of the investigation should be to learn whether State banks
would accept the deposits. He was told to prepare his own instructions,
and thus the head of the Kitchen Cabinet sallied forth on his own terms.
About the same time, Jackson, in need of a rest and release from the
sultry atmosphere of Washington, went to Rip Raps in Hampton Roads,
where he was accustomed to relax in the summer, accompanied by Frank
Blair. Thus, with one member of the Kitchen Cabinet making a tour of the
banks on his own instructions, another was at Jackson’s elbow in the
unconventional environment of Rip Raps.[635] All these various moves
were promptly reported to Biddle by some member of the Administration,
and on the day Kendall was expected in Philadelphia, the financial
autocrat was writing to Dr. Cooper, his new ally, in laudation of the
firmness of Duane and the viciousness of the Kitchen Cabinet.[636]
Meanwhile, in his visits to the banks of Baltimore, Philadelphia, New
York, and Boston, Kendall was pulled and hauled and mauled by both the
servitors of the Bank and the conservatives of the Administration
circle. At Philadelphia it was hinted that a fortune was within his
grasp if he would but avail himself of the opportunity.[637] There, too,
he fell foul of James Gordon Bennett, then editor of the
“Pennsylvanian,” whose mask of cordiality was dropped in the publication
of Kendall’s private letters showing hostility to the Bank--as though
private letters were necessary to the proof.[638]
But more significant, and politically more important, was Kendall’s
interview with Van Buren and McLane in New York City. The three met by
chance in the breakfast room of an hotel, and in an interview, then
arranged, it was proposed by the hedging politicians that the removal of
the deposits be postponed until January when Congress would be in
session. This plan originated with McLane, and Kendall, who suspected it
was proposed with the hope and expectation that Congress would
interpose, replied that he would be satisfied provided McLane, Duane,
and the other Bank Democrats would agree to use their personal influence
with members of Congress to have the deposits removed.[639] It was
agreed that all three should write Jackson at Rip Raps, and, in
complying, Kendall said that the proposal was against his judgment, and
Jackson instantly rejected it.[640]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account