The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
The effect on the Senate may be better imagined than described.
Poindexter, whose private grudge was the inspiration of his renegadism,
could not “express the feeling of indignation” the paper had excited in
his bosom, and he would “spurn it from the Senate”--“that body which
stands as a barrier between the people and the encroachments of
executive power.” It was not a Message--merely “a paper, signed ‘Andrew
Jackson,’” and “nothing else.”[728] Sprague of Maine, who had been
pilloried, spoke “more in grief than in anger,” and while the President
had referred to “his Secretary” and felt that this was “his Government,”
he, the Senator, “never bowed the knee to Baal.” And while the tyrant
was appealing to the people, look about. “Behold your green fields
withered; listen to the cries of distress of the widows and orphans,
rising almost in execration of the exercise of that power which has
blasted their hopes and reduced them to despair.”[729] Frelinghuysen of
New Jersey, another pilloried statesman, next arose to discuss “this
most extraordinary proceeding--one which would form an era in American
history.” What a spectacle! “When the busy hum of industry was silenced,
when the laborer was in want of employment, when banks were breaking in
every direction, and the cries for relief from the unrelenting hand of
power were heard everywhere around us,” the Senate had listened to a
lecture of an hour and a half. And why refer to the New Jersey
Legislature? He had “dared to meet the frowns of his constituents”
because of his zeal for his country.[730] Southard of New Jersey, also
pilloried by Jackson, hoped that he might “school himself into that
degree of moderation necessary for the occasion.” He could find no
excuse for Jackson’s indignation. And yet “we have received, not from
Charles I, Cromwell, or Napoleon Bonaparte, but from a man combining the
characters of the whole of them, a warning to cease our further
proceedings.”[731] And Leigh closed the day’s events by declaring
“before God that upon the fate of these resolutions, and the disposition
of this question, depends the permanency of the Constitution, handed
down to us by our fathers.”[732]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account