The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
To get the right perspective upon these speeches, it should be borne in
mind that at the time of their delivery the business men were openly
charging Biddle with responsibility for the panic. Niles’s “Register”
had admitted that the Bank’s power was too great, and the “St. Louis
Republican,” a stanch supporter of the Bank, had turned upon it with a
bitter denunciation of its course.[733] Thus, however, the debate began,
and in this spirit was it continued for a month--a month of fierce
invective. On the second day, following the philippic of Leigh, the
crowds in the packed galleries clashed with cheers and hisses.
Especially pleased were the galleries when, apropos of Jackson’s
reference to his gray hairs, the fiery cripple compared him to Mount
Ætna, “whose summit was capped with eternal snow, but which was always
vomiting forth its liquid fire.”[734] The discussion finally revolved
around the Poindexter resolutions not to receive. A few days later
Calhoun attacked the Protest with great bitterness, and amendments were
offered by both Calhoun and Forsyth. That of the Carolinian declared the
President had no right to send, and the Senate no right to receive, such
a document. Then the Administration disclosed its hand in the Forsyth
resolution providing that “an authenticated copy of the original
resolution [Clay’s] with a list of the ayes and nays, of the President’s
Message and the pending resolution be prepared ... and transmitted to
the Governor of each State of the Union to be laid before their
legislature at the next session, as the only authority authorized to
decide upon the opinions and conduct of the Senators.”[735] Here was a
declaration, by indirection, from the leader of the Administration that
the President was not authorized to pass upon the opinions and conduct
of Senators. Had the resolution stopped there, it would not have
differed materially from those of Poindexter or the resolution of
Calhoun. But it declared that there was an authority to pass upon the
conduct of Senators--the people who elected them to the Senate; and
that, with the facts before them, they should pass upon the conduct of
the public servants. This was an impressive proclamation that the
Jacksonian Senators were convinced that the people sustained them; and
the fact that the Forsyth resolution was defeated by a party vote was an
admission from the Opposition that it lacked such faith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account