The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
But the immediate purpose of the Virginia Democrats was to humiliate
Leigh, who was unpopular with the masses because of his bitter fight in
the Constitutional Convention against the extension of the suffrage. And
he was as strongly with the Bank as Virginia was against it. A
house-to-house canvass was made, and in districts where a majority were
found against him it was proposed to evoke the right of instructions to
Assemblymen. The plan succeeded to the extent of disclosing a majority
hostile to the reëlection of Leigh, but the Whigs, who carried the
State, succeeded after a bitter struggle in returning him through a
flagrant disregard of the expressed will of the constituencies. The
battle was thus but half lost. The Democrats were supplied with
ammunition they were to use with deadly effect, and within little more
than a year they were to drive the two anti-Jackson Senators of Virginia
into private life. Ritchie began the next year’s battle without delay.
The “Enquirer” was flooded with resolutions and letters protesting the
election of Leigh over the instructions of the majority of the
people.[770]
In Mississippi the Jacksonians determined to prevent the reëlection of
Senator Poindexter, long the idol of the Mississippi Democracy, who had
turned upon Jackson with a virulence scarcely equaled by any old-line
Federalist, and cast his lot with Clay. With the adjournment of
Congress, the Mississippi Senator hastened home, where the enemies of
the Administration had planned a series of banquets at which he was to
denounce the President and vindicate himself. The Whigs were with him.
The Democrats, delighted with a slashing and brilliant assault on
Poindexter by Robert J. Walker, put that able publicist in the field,
and within a week he was engaged in one of the most spectacular
canvasses Mississippi had ever known, firing enormous open-air meetings
of frenzied Jacksonians. The outcome was the election of Walker--a
victory sweet to Jackson, for it was the vanquished who had sponsored
the resolution attacking his Protest.[771] And the triumph was all the
sweeter from the fact that, while Poindexter had supported the
Nullifiers, Walker had taken the lead against them in Mississippi, on
the platform, and through the press.
Thus the elections of 1834 were more than pleasing to Jackson and his
party. Two of his strongest senatorial opponents had lost their seats as
a result of their opposition, and Leigh had been saved only by a
disreputable betrayal of the people. In the Senate the Administration
was strengthened; and in the House the Democratic majority was reduced
but eight votes, leaving it a clear majority of 46 out of 242 members.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account