The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
But in the House, Barry’s personal integrity was not to go unchallenged.
In the lower branch he was unfortunate in friends who loved, not wisely,
but too well, who thought to prevent assault by challenging it. Some of
these had avowed a disposition to consider such an assault a personal
offense. During a night session, William C. Johnson of Maryland, a
promising and eloquent young Whig of imposing personal appearance,
sought an opportunity to affront Representative Hawes of Kentucky, a
member of the special dueling club. An insignificant incident during the
discussion of a post-route bill sufficed. On obtaining the floor,
Johnson looked significantly at Hawes, and with sinister deliberation
began: “It has been broadly hinted by some gentlemen ... that he who
shall have the temerity to criticize the acts of the Postmaster-General
must answer therefor elsewhere than in this hall.... Sir, I come from a
portion of the country where the law of personal responsibility is
recognized among gentlemen. I hold myself amenable to that law ...; and
now, in the face of those menaces which have been thrown out on this
floor, and intending to be responsible for what I am about to say, I
declare that the Post-Office Department is corrupt from head to foot,
through and through, and I believe that the head of the department,
William T. Barry, is as culpable as any officer under his control.”
The House was instantly in an uproar as Hawes rose to ask if Johnson
meant that the department was corrupt from Barry down. The young blade
from Maryland jauntily replied in the affirmative. Hawes said that Barry
was “as honest and honorable as any man who has a seat on this floor,”
and asked Johnson for the grounds for his charge. In the spirit of
swashbuckler he had set out to be, the latter merely reiterated what he
had said. There was no misunderstanding the meaning of the situation--it
meant a duel unless Johnson would agree to a qualification of his
statement. To all such appeals he was adamant. When, as a result, he was
challenged by Barry’s son, he began to hedge with the demand that the
duel take place “immediately.” He would not even consent to a day’s
delay, and young Barry withdrew the challenge. The incident proved
nothing except that in the Thirties young men carried chips on their
shoulders, and bandied words lightly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account