The party battles of the Jackson period — John Shaqi
The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
With the appearance of Democracy in action came some evils that have
persisted through the succeeding years--the penalties of the rule of the
people. Demagogy then reared its head and licked its tongue. Class
consciousness and hatreds were awakened. And, on the part of the great
corporations, intimidation, coercion, and the corrupt use of money to
control elections were contributed. These evils are a heritage of the
bitter party battles of the Jacksonian period--battles as brilliant as
they were bitter.
The purpose of this volume is to describe these mad party struggles, and
to picture, as they really were, the great historical figures, “warts
and all.” If Henry Clay is here shown as an unscrupulous, selfish,
scheming politician, rather than as the mythical figure who “would
rather be right than President”; if John C. Calhoun is here described as
petty in his personal hates and spites and in his resentment over the
failure of personal ambitions; if Daniel Webster, the most admirable of
the three during these eight vivid years, is set forth, not only as the
great Nationalist who replied to Hayne and sustained Jackson’s
Nullification Proclamation, but as the defender of the Bank from which,
at the beginning of the fight, he bluntly solicited a “refreshment” of
his retainer, it is not through any desire to befoul their fame, but to
set down the truth as irrefutably disclosed in the records, and to
depict them as they were--intensely human in their moral limitations.
The necessities of history happily call for the featuring of some
figures, potent in their generation, attractive in their genius, and
necessarily passed over by historians covering much longer periods. No
close-up picture of the time can be painted that ignores Edward
Livingston, patriot and philosopher; Roger B. Taney, the militant party
leader; John Forsyth, the “greatest debater of his time”; John M.
Clayton, the real master of both Calhoun and Clay in the Compromise of
1833; George McDuffie, the tempestuous Danton of the Opposition; Hugh
Lawson White, the “Cato of the Senate” and the Nemesis of Jacksonian
Democracy; William Cabell Preston and Horace Binney, the polished
orators, now almost forgotten; Major Lewis, the master of political
details; Frank Blair, the slashing journalistic champion of the
Administration; and Amos Kendall, the genius of the Kitchen Cabinet.
An analysis of motives and methods has led to some unconventional
conclusions. Not only do Clay, Webster, and Calhoun dwindle in moral
grandeur, but others, traditionally considered small, loom large. Thus
the John Tyler of these eight years stands out in intellectual honesty,
courage, and consistency far beyond others to whom history has been more
generous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account