The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
But here again appeared cross-currents difficult to understand. South
Carolina, usually so subservient to the wishes of her great statesman,
but now cool toward him, was uncompromisingly hostile to his favorite
for the Treasury. The other leading members of the South Carolina
delegation, known to be opposed to Ingham and to prefer McLane to him,
had hesitated from motives of delicacy to make their views known to
Jackson; and Van Buren’s favorite for the position authorized Hamilton,
Van Buren’s emissary, to notify the General of their willingness to call
if their opinion was wanted.[138] On February 17th, the Carolinians,
including Senator Hayne, McDuffie, Hamilton, Archer, and Drayton, filed
into the throne room at Gadsby’s, and Hamilton, who acted as spokesman,
began by tactfully commending the selection of Van Buren, and then
turned to the Treasury. Before he could announce his candidate, Jackson
interrupted with the announcement that Ingham had been chosen. Nothing
daunted, Hamilton suggested as a better choice the brilliant Langdon
Cheves of South Carolina. “Impossible,” snapped the grim old man. Then
why not McLane? That, too, was instantly dismissed, and the Carolinians
left Gadsby’s in a rage. “I assure you I am cool--damn cool--never half
so cool in my life,” Hamilton exclaimed immediately afterwards.[139]
For the War Department there was no such competition, and after an
unsuccessful attempt had been made to conciliate Tazewell with the post,
Jackson, who was anxious to have among his advisers one of his old
friends and managers, satisfied himself with the selection of Senator
John H. Eaton of Tennessee.
The processes of reasoning leading to the appointment of Senator John
Branch of North Carolina as Secretary of the Navy have been lost to
history and there is no clue. We know that Van Buren and his friends
strongly urged the selection of Woodbury of New Hampshire; and McLane
expressed the contemporary state of mind in a letter to his friend: “By
what interest that miserable old woman, Branch, was ever dreamed of, no
one can tell.” This much we know--that Branch himself did not have the
most remote idea of entering the Cabinet when the invitation reached him
from Gadsby’s, and he withheld his acceptance until he could consult
with a number of his friends.[140] Two reasons have been advanced as
probable. The one, popular at the time, was that Jackson’s advisers
thought that something should be done to promote the social prestige of
the Administration; and the other, generally accepted by historians,
that the appointment was made as another concession to Calhoun. While
the Carolinian made no request for his inclusion in the Cabinet, Branch
was one of his most loyal followers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account