The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
The enemies of Jackson sought the earliest possible opportunity to
denounce the wholesale dismissals, and the brilliant orators of the
Opposition in the House made intemperate attacks, while in the Senate
Webster spoke against the policy of proscription, without, however,
adopting the absurd position that the President did not possess the
constitutional power.[209] The early part of the session was given over
to denunciations of the removals, and to a frankly hostile scrutiny, on
the part of the Senate, of all nominations requiring confirmation. It
foreshadowed the bitter party battles of the next eight years by
rejecting the nominations of some of Jackson’s most ardent supporters in
the campaign, and by taking the ridiculous position that journalists
should be excluded from appointive office. This proscription, or
massacre of the editors, was aimed at men, comparatively new to public
life, who were speedily to develop into the most brilliant and sagacious
of the Jacksonian leaders. Long and acrimonious executive sessions
became the rule of the Senate. In some instances, action upon
nominations was postponed for months under provocative circumstances
that were not lost upon the fighting figure at the other end of the
Avenue. The charge was made that a number of the President’s nominees
were “vicious characters.” It was in the early days of this session that
a comparatively new Senator, elected upon the supposition that he would
support the President and his policies, and destined to be the only
member of the Senate to realize personally upon that body’s venomous
hostility to the Administration, stepped forth to organize and direct
the fight against the confirmation of nominees in whom the President was
deeply interested. John Tyler led the first onslaught on the
Administration.
It is important to pause to contemplate Tyler’s character and career,
because he typifies those Democrats who were so soon to enter into
coöperation with the Whigs in opposition, and because history has been
unjust in underestimating both his capacity and courage. We shall find
him pursuing Jackson throughout the greater part of his Presidency, and
paying the penalty to the people with a manliness which found little
emulation among men to whom history has been more gracious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account