The party battles of the Jackson periodBowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
History
The party battles of the Jackson period
Bowers, Claude G. (Claude Gernade)
Jackson, Andrew, 1767-1845; United States -- Politics and government -- 1829-1837
The first act of Jackson’s, on being told of Calhoun’s hostility in the
Monroe Cabinet, was to call for a copy of Crawford’s letter to Forsyth,
and to enclose it in a letter to the Vice-President, expressing his
surprise and asking for his version. The next development in the
controversy came in the form of a long letter from Calhoun, practically
admitting the charge, and elaborately condemning and damning Crawford
for the betrayal of a Cabinet secret. This reply was delivered to
Jackson on a Sunday on his way to church, and he wrote a brief and
significant answer on his return to the White House on the same day. The
closing words sealed the doom of Calhoun as far as the Presidency was
concerned. “In your and Mr. Crawford’s dispute I have no interest
whatever,” he wrote. “But it may become necessary for me hereafter, when
I shall have more leisure and the documents at hand, to notice the
historical facts and references in your communication--which will give a
very different view to the subject. Understanding you now, no further
communication with you on this subject is necessary.”
About this time he sent Calhoun’s letter to Van Buren, who refused to
read it, explaining that he would be accused of fomenting the trouble
and preferred to know nothing about it. When the messenger returned to
Jackson with the comment of his Secretary of State, he replied, “I
reckon Van is right. I dare say they will try to throw the blame on
him.”[270] And of course Van Buren was right. After many conferences on
the subject with Calhoun, Adams recorded in his diary that “Calhoun is
under the firm persuasion that the author of this combustion is Martin
Van Buren, who has used the agency of James A. Hamilton in producing it,
and that Hamilton, as well as Forsyth, had been a go-between to and from
Nashville.”[271] The denial of Van Buren at the time was discounted by
the anxiety of Hamilton, after talking with Forsyth in Georgia, to have
Crawford’s statement in writing. Nothing, however, could have been more
effective in eliminating Calhoun from the presidential race.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account