not discriminating between rich and poor; it does the reverse, of
course. And until Justice opens her eyes again to discriminate what is
put into her scales she will remain the mock she now is.
In a previous book I have discussed the question of veracity in this
connection, and lest anyone should object that what I say is true only
of the Burmese I will add this story, which is of a well-known official
in the North-West in his younger days.
He was inquiring into a Revenue case, and incidentally an Indian
gentleman gave him certain information. The official thought this so
important that he summoned the Indian to Court, where, much to the
Englishman's surprise, the Indian as a witness gave a totally different
story.
They met again, however, later, and the official asked the Indian
gentleman what he meant by going back on his words like that. The
latter smiled, hesitated, and then the wisdom of experience spoke to
the altruism of ignorance in these words: "Sahib," he said, "you are
very young."
How the Courts are generally regarded by the people can best be
illustrated by giving an account of a dramatic entertainment I
witnessed once. The Burmese are fond of the drama. They have old
dramas, and they have new dramas up to date--satires for the most part.
The play I saw was of the latter. The company was a well-known one,
which had toured almost all the province, and its most famous piece was
that I witnessed--I forget the name.
The scene was supposed to be the office of a lawyer, barrister, or
advocate, and there was a native clerk. To him entered a would-be
litigant. The clerk listens to him for a few minutes and then asks him
if he has brought any money. The client says "No." The clerk rises in
indignation and the client is hustled out.
He returns with a bag of money. The clerk then listens and the client
explains his case. The clerk demands if there is any evidence. The
client is puzzled and asks what evidence is required. The clerk then
tells him slowly and distinctly: you must have a man to swear to this,
another to swear to that, a third to swear to something else.
The client remonstrates, saying he doubts if he can get so much
evidence. The clerk then tells him that if he cannot get the evidence
demanded his master will not take up his case. "But," says the client
indignantly, "it is a true case." "What does that matter?" asks the
clerk cynically. "No Court cares--or can tell if it did care--whether
your case is true or not. It can only tell if you have evidence or
not. If you can't get the evidence your case may be the truest in the
world, but that won't help you."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account