The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European historyGrant, Madison
History
The passing of the great race; or, The racial basis of European history
Grant, Madison
Ethnology -- Europe
The statements relating to time have presented the greatest difficulty,
as the authorities differ widely, but the dates have been fixed with
extreme conservatism and the writer believes that whatever changes in
them are hereafter required by further investigation and study, will
result in pushing them back and not forward in prehistory. The dates
given in the chapter on “Paleolithic Man” are frankly taken from the
most recent authority on this subject, “The Men of the Old Stone Age,”
by Prof. Henry Fairfield Osborn and the writer desires to take this
opportunity to acknowledge his great indebtedness to this source of
information, as well as to Mr. M. Taylor Pyne and to Mr. Charles Stewart
Davison for their assistance and many helpful suggestions.
The author also wishes to acknowledge his obligation to Prof. William Z.
Ripley’s “The Races of Europe,” which contains a large array of
anthropological measurements, maps and type portraits, providing
valuable data for the present distribution of the three primary races of
Europe.
The American Geographical Society and its staff, particularly Mr. Leon
Dominian, have also been of great help in the preparation of the maps
herein contained and this occasion is taken by the writer to express his
appreciation for their assistance.
INTRODUCTION TO THE FOURTH REVISED EDITION
The addition of a Documentary Supplement to the latest revision of this
book has been made in response to a persistent demand for “authorities.”
The author has endeavored to make the references and quotations in this
Supplement very full and, so far as possible, interesting in themselves
as well as entirely distinct from the text, which stands substantially
unchanged, and the authorities quoted are not necessarily the sources of
the views herein expressed but more often are given in support of them.
The contents of the book, since its first appearance, have had the
advantage of the criticism of virtually every anthropologist in America
and in England, France and Italy—many of whom have furnished the author
with valuable corroborative material. Some of this material appears in
the notes, but accessible authorities and the classical writers have
been given the more prominent place. The supplement covered, as first
prepared, substantially every statement in the book, but much was
afterward omitted because it would seem that some things could be taken
without proof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account