The Path, Vol. I.—1886-'7.: A Magazine Devoted to the Brotherhood of Humanity, Theosophy in America, and the Study of Occult Science, Philosophy, and Aryan Literature.Various
Religion
The Path, Vol. I.—1886-'7.: A Magazine Devoted to the Brotherhood of Humanity, Theosophy in America, and the Study of Occult Science, Philosophy, and Aryan Literature.
Various
Theosophy -- Periodicals
It must be known that it is claimed for the Sacred Scroll by the
Hebrew, that no letter in it has ever been changed, and that even the
marginal readings were part of the original text for a varied use
thereof, in perfect accord with the object of its writing. Unlike the
Christian Gospels, with the Hebrews and Jews, alike, the original text
was sacredly precious as to its every and very letter, and had to be
thus preserved. To the contrary of this, the Gospels can be changed in
their reading to suit the currently changing ideas of what the same
should be. The marks to indicate “_right reading_” were after the time
of Ezra gradually made public, were called _Massorah_, and finally,
edited by Ben Chajim, were published by Bomberg, in Venice, in the
fifteenth century.
After this fashion and mode the books of the Old Testament were
prepared and read by the Jews long before the time of the Christian
Era. They were thus accepted at that time; and afterwards by the
Christian World:—so that, to day, we accept the record, as thus
prepared by the ancient orthodox Jewish and Hebrew Church.
Whatever may have been the Jewish mode of complete interpretation of
these books, the Christian Church had taken them _for what they show
on their first face_,—and that only. As they may be read orally, so is
their fullest meaning to be gathered from the oral reading; and by
means of what the sound of the words may convey to the ear the full and
complete intendment of meaning is to be had. The Christian Church has
never attributed to these books any property beyond this; and herein
has existed its great error.
Now, as said, the substance of the Cabbalah is a rendering of the
secret doctrine of the Old Testament, and this is not only asserted,
but an argument is raised about the matter in the following set terms:
“If the Law simply consisted of ordinary expressions and narratives,
ex. gr. the words of Esau, Hagar, Laban, the ass of Balaam, or of
Balaam himself, why should it be called the Law of Truth, the perfect
law, the true witness of God? Each word contains a sublime source,
each narrative points not only to the single instance in question, but
also to generals.” (Sohar iii, 149 b). “Woe be to the son of man who
says that the Tora (Pentateuch) contains common sayings and ordinary
narratives. * * There is the garment that every one can see, but those
who have more understanding do not look at the garment but at the body
beneath it; while the wisest, the servants of the Heavenly King, those
who dwell at Mount Sinai, look at nothing else but the soul (i.e., the
secret doctrine), which is the root of all the real Law.” (Sohar, iii,
152 a).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account