The 'Patriotes' of '37: A Chronicle of the Lower Canada RebellionDeCelles, Alfred D. (Alfred Duclos)
History
The 'Patriotes' of '37: A Chronicle of the Lower Canada Rebellion
DeCelles, Alfred D. (Alfred Duclos)
Canada -- History -- Rebellion, 1837-1838
[1] The name _Chouayen_ or _Chouaguen_ appears to have been first used
as a term of reproach at the siege of Oswego in 1756. It is said that
after the fall of the forts there to Montcalm's armies a number of
Canadian soldiers arrived too late to take part in the fighting. By
the soldiers who had borne the brunt of the battle the late-comers were
dubbed _Chouaguens_, this being the way the rank and file of the French
soldiers pronounced the Indian name of Oswego. Thus the term came to
mean one who refuses to follow, or who lets others do the fighting and
keeps out of it himself. Perhaps the nearest English, or rather
American, equivalent is the name Mugwump.
{44}
CHAPTER VI
THE ROYAL COMMISSION
A general election followed soon after the passing of the Ninety-Two
Resolutions and revealed the strength of Papineau's position in the
country. All those members of the _Patriote_ party who had opposed the
Resolutions--Neilson, Cuvillier, Quesnel, Stuart, and two or three
others--suffered defeat at the polls. The first division-list in the
new Assembly showed seventy members voting for Papineau as speaker, and
only six voting against him.
The Resolutions were forwarded to Westminster, both through the
Assembly's agent in London and through Lord Aylmer, who received the
address embodying the Resolutions, despite the fact that they demanded
his own impeachment. The British House of Commons appointed a special
committee to inquire into the grievances of which the Resolutions
complained; but there followed {45} no immediate action by the
government. The years 1834 and 1835 saw much disturbance in British
politics: there were no less than four successive ministers at the
Colonial Office. It was natural that there should be some delay in
dealing with the troubles of Lower Canada. In the spring of 1835,
however, the government made up its mind about the course to pursue.
It decided to send to Canada a royal commission for the purpose of
investigating, and if possible settling, the questions in dispute. It
was thought advisable to combine in one person the office of chief
royal commissioner and that of governor of Canada. To clear the way
for this arrangement Lord Aylmer was recalled. But he was expressly
relieved from all censure: it was merely recognized by the authorities
that his unfortunate relations with the Assembly made it unlikely that
he would be able to offer any assistance in a solution of the problem.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account