The 'Patriotes' of '37: A Chronicle of the Lower Canada Rebellion — John Shaqi
The 'Patriotes' of '37: A Chronicle of the Lower Canada RebellionDeCelles, Alfred D. (Alfred Duclos)
History
The 'Patriotes' of '37: A Chronicle of the Lower Canada Rebellion
DeCelles, Alfred D. (Alfred Duclos)
Canada -- History -- Rebellion, 1837-1838
When the American colonies broke out in revolution in 1775, the
Continental Congress thought to induce the French Canadians to join
hands with them. But the conciliatory policy of the successive
governors Murray and Carleton, and the concessions granted by the
Quebec Act of the year before, had borne {3} fruit; and when the
American leaders Arnold and Montgomery invaded Canada, the great
majority of the habitants remained at least passively loyal. A few
hundred of them may have joined the invaders, but a much larger number
enlisted under Carleton. The clergy, the seigneurs, and the
professional classes--lawyers and physicians and notaries--remained
firm in their allegiance to Great Britain; while the mass of the people
resisted the eloquent appeals of Congress, represented by its
emissaries Franklin, Chase, and Carroll, and even those of the
distinguished Frenchmen, Lafayette and Count d'Estaing, who strongly
urged them to join the rebels. Nor should it be forgotten that at the
siege of Quebec by Arnold the Canadian officers Colonel Dupre and
Captains Dambourges, Dumas, and Marcoux, with many others, were among
Carleton's most trusted and efficient aides in driving back the
invading Americans. True, in 1781, Sir Frederick Haldimand, then
governor of Canada, wrote that although the clergy had been firmly
loyal in 1775 and had exerted their powerful influence in favour of
Great Britain, they had since then changed their opinions and were no
longer to be relied upon. But it must be {4} borne in mind that
Haldimand ruled the province in the manner of a soldier. His
high-handed orders caused dissatisfaction, which he probably mistook
for a want of loyalty among the clergy. No more devoted subject of
Great Britain lived at the time in Lower Canada than Mgr Briand, the
bishop of Quebec; and the priests shaped their conduct after that of
their superior. At any rate, the danger which Haldimand feared did not
take form; and the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 made it
more unlikely than ever.
The French Revolution profoundly affected the attitude of the French
Canadians toward France. Canada was the child of the _ancien regime_.
Within her borders the ideas of Voltaire and Rousseau had found no
shelter. Canada had nothing in common with the anti-clerical and
republican tendencies of the Revolution. That movement created a gap
between France and Canada which has not been bridged to this day. In
the Napoleonic wars the sympathies of Canada were almost wholly with
Great Britain. When news arrived of the defeat of the French fleet at
Trafalgar, a _Te Deum_ was sung in the Catholic cathedral at Quebec;
and, in a sermon {5} preached on that occasion, a future bishop of the
French-Canadian Church enunciated the principle that 'all events which
tend to broaden the gap separating us from France should be welcome.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account